From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] [python] Prompt substitution
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 10:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3ehzy7xb1.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109021822.02655.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 2 Sep 2011 18:22:02 +0100")
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Tuesday 30 August 2011 21:33:24, Phil Muldoon wrote:
>> I think in the case, display_gdb_prompt is just displaying what GDB
>> knows to be the prompt. If you delete the hook, whatever was the prompt
>> when the prompt was set will remain the prompt. So the hook set the
>> prompt whenever in time, and when you delete the hook, it won't restore
>> what the old prompt was. So if you disable the prompt, then set prompt
>> foo, then you will get "foo" now until you change it again manually. In
>> the case of "guarded prompt" (IE >) it won't attempt to alter that
>> display at all.
>
> I see. I assumed that the python hook worked by overriding
> "set prompt", but that the result wouldn't be seen by "show prompt".
> That is, set/show prompt always worked at the "this is what
> I want the prompt to look like if no scripting overrides it" level.
> Okay, I preserved the current behaviour. Matt's new (uncommitted)
> py-prompt.exp tests were great for making sure I did. :-)
Yeah this was a port from archer, something I did not originally write,
but has been asked for since, well, forever. I'm not strongly swayed by
the behavior, as it is, or, as in your scenario working around
set_prompt. Tom might have other thoughts as I think he wrote most of
this stuff. But FWIW, I don't mind if you change it to your method --
both seem equally valid use-cases.
Cheers,
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-03 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 17:09 Phil Muldoon
2011-07-19 22:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-20 13:05 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-20 14:43 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-21 11:15 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-08-30 19:18 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-30 20:23 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-08-30 20:18 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-30 20:33 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-09-02 17:41 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-03 10:15 ` Phil Muldoon [this message]
2011-07-20 17:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3ehzy7xb1.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox