From: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] [python] Prompt substitution
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 20:33:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38vqar65n.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108302118.18505.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:18:18 +0100")
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Wednesday 20 July 2011 12:33:24, Phil Muldoon wrote:
>> +gdb_test_multiple "set prompt blah " "set blah in GDB" {
>> + -re "\[\r\n\]$newprompt2 $" {
>> + pass "set prompt blah overriden"
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +gdb_test_multiple "python gdb.prompt_hook = None" "Delete hook" {
>> + -re "\[\r\n\]$newprompt2 $" {
>> + pass "Delete old hook"
>> + }
>> +}
>
> Hmm:
>
> ...
> PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: show prompt shows guarded prompt
> set prompt blah
> py prompt 2 PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: set prompt blah overriden
> python gdb.prompt_hook = None
> py prompt 2 PASS: gdb.python/python.exp: Delete old hook
>
> I think this last PASS is actually a bug. We've disabled the python
> hook, so we should get the "set prompt" prompt back ("blah")
> instead of still seeing the python prompt. Agree?
>
> (My WIP no-prompt-stack patch turned that into a FAIL,
> but it looks like it's a bug fix, not a regression.)
I think in the case, display_gdb_prompt is just displaying what GDB
knows to be the prompt. If you delete the hook, whatever was the prompt
when the prompt was set will remain the prompt. So the hook set the
prompt whenever in time, and when you delete the hook, it won't restore
what the old prompt was. So if you disable the prompt, then set prompt
foo, then you will get "foo" now until you change it again manually. In
the case of "guarded prompt" (IE >) it won't attempt to alter that
display at all.
Cheers,
Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-30 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-18 17:09 Phil Muldoon
2011-07-19 22:58 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-20 13:05 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-20 14:43 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-21 11:15 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-08-30 19:18 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-30 20:23 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-08-30 20:18 ` Pedro Alves
2011-08-30 20:33 ` Phil Muldoon [this message]
2011-09-02 17:41 ` Pedro Alves
2011-09-03 10:15 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-20 17:10 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38vqar65n.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=pmuldoon@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox