* [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
@ 2005-05-14 9:23 Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 16:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-05-14 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches, gdb-patches
More of the same:
2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
* fopen_unlocked.c: Enclose multi-word data types in @deftypefn in
braces.
Index: libiberty/fopen_unlocked.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/libiberty/fopen_unlocked.c,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.4 fopen_unlocked.c
--- libiberty/fopen_unlocked.c 10 May 2005 15:33:33 -0000 1.4
+++ libiberty/fopen_unlocked.c 14 May 2005 08:53:13 -0000
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
@end deftypefn
-@deftypefn Extension FILE * fopen_unlocked (const char *@var{path}, const char * @var{mode})
+@deftypefn Extension {FILE *} fopen_unlocked (const char *@var{path}, const char * @var{mode})
Opens and returns a @code{FILE} pointer via @code{fopen}. If the
operating system supports it, ensure that the stream is setup to avoid
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
@end deftypefn
-@deftypefn Extension FILE * fdopen_unlocked (int @var{fildes}, const char * @var{mode})
+@deftypefn Extension {FILE *} fdopen_unlocked (int @var{fildes}, const char * @var{mode})
Opens and returns a @code{FILE} pointer via @code{fdopen}. If the
operating system supports it, ensure that the stream is setup to avoid
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
@end deftypefn
-@deftypefn Extension FILE * freopen_unlocked (const char * @var{path}, const char * @var{mode}, FILE * @var{stream})
+@deftypefn Extension {FILE *} freopen_unlocked (const char * @var{path}, const char * @var{mode}, FILE * @var{stream})
Opens and returns a @code{FILE} pointer via @code{freopen}. If the
operating system supports it, ensure that the stream is setup to avoid
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-14 9:23 [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c Eli Zaretskii
@ 2005-05-15 16:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-05-15 17:04 ` Andreas Jaeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Ian Lance Taylor @ 2005-05-15 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: gcc-patches, gdb-patches
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> More of the same:
>
> 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>
> * fopen_unlocked.c: Enclose multi-word data types in @deftypefn in
> braces.
This is OK. Thanks.
Ian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 16:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
@ 2005-05-15 17:04 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2005-05-15 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Lance Taylor; +Cc: Eli Zaretskii, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --]
Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> More of the same:
>>
>> 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>> * fopen_unlocked.c: Enclose multi-word data types in @deftypefn in
>> braces.
>
> This is OK. Thanks.
Committed to GCC mainline,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 17:04 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 18:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2005-05-15 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor, Eli Zaretskii, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:
>
> > "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> >> More of the same:
> >>
> >> 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >>
> >> * fopen_unlocked.c: Enclose multi-word data types in @deftypefn in
> >> braces.
> >
> > This is OK. Thanks.
>
> Committed to GCC mainline,
functions.texi should be regenerated when committing this patches (and it
should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed pass "make
info" and "make dvi" before committing it).
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2005-05-15 18:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-15 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 22:05 ` Andreas Jaeger
2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2005-05-15 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor, Eli Zaretskii, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 895 bytes --]
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Sun, 15 May 2005, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
>> Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> writes:
>>
>> > "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> >
>> >> More of the same:
>> >>
>> >> 2005-05-14 Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> * fopen_unlocked.c: Enclose multi-word data types in @deftypefn in
>> >> braces.
>> >
>> > This is OK. Thanks.
>>
>> Committed to GCC mainline,
>
> functions.texi should be regenerated when committing this patches (and it
> should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed pass "make
> info" and "make dvi" before committing it).
Ok, will take care of it,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 18:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2005-05-15 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 20:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 22:05 ` Andreas Jaeger
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-05-15 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: aj, ian, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:25:15 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> functions.texi should be regenerated when committing this patches
Right. I didn't do that, since I cannot commit changes to the GCC
repository.
> (and it should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed
> pass "make info" and "make dvi" before committing it).
I verified the former before I submitted the patches. As for the
latter, unless someone is going to preview the DVI output and make
sure it looks okay in print, "make info" can be regarded as a
good-enough test for "make dvi" as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2005-05-15 20:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 22:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2005-05-15 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: aj, ian, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > (and it should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed
> > pass "make info" and "make dvi" before committing it).
>
> I verified the former before I submitted the patches. As for the
> latter, unless someone is going to preview the DVI output and make
> sure it looks okay in print, "make info" can be regarded as a
> good-enough test for "make dvi" as well.
On the contrary, many times patches have broken "make dvi" but passed
"make info". See the last such breakage in libiberty
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02853.html> for an example.
"make info" and "make dvi" detect different subsets of invalid Texinfo;
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html specifies both for documentation
patches for a reason.
--
Joseph S. Myers http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/gcc/
jsm@polyomino.org.uk (personal mail)
joseph@codesourcery.com (CodeSourcery mail)
jsm28@gcc.gnu.org (Bugzilla assignments and CCs)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 20:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2005-05-15 22:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-05-15 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: aj, ian, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:52:01 +0000 (UTC)
> From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
> cc: aj@suse.de, ian@airs.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
> gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > I verified the former before I submitted the patches. As for the
> > latter, unless someone is going to preview the DVI output and make
> > sure it looks okay in print, "make info" can be regarded as a
> > good-enough test for "make dvi" as well.
>
> On the contrary, many times patches have broken "make dvi" but passed
> "make info".
I didn't say it was a perfect test, just a good-enough one.
> See the last such breakage in libiberty
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg02853.html> for an example.
I didn't change any places that could cause similar problems in this
specific manual.
> "make info" and "make dvi" detect different subsets of invalid Texinfo;
In general, yes; but in the case of libiberty, not really.
P.S. If you have such stringent standards for accepting docs patches,
how come what I found needed so many fixes? I found those problems by
simply looking at the index; any reasonable QA should have discovered
that long ago.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 18:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-15 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2005-05-15 22:05 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-16 1:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Jaeger @ 2005-05-15 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joseph S. Myers; +Cc: Ian Lance Taylor, Eli Zaretskii, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 560 bytes --]
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> writes:
> functions.texi should be regenerated when committing this patches (and it
> should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed pass "make
> info" and "make dvi" before committing it).
FYI: Everything has been done - and was successfull. I committed
functions.texi already...
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
SUSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c
2005-05-15 22:05 ` Andreas Jaeger
@ 2005-05-16 1:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2005-05-16 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Jaeger; +Cc: joseph, ian, gcc-patches, gdb-patches
> From: Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de>
> Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:20:51 +0200
>
> FYI: Everything has been done - and was successfull. I committed
> functions.texi already...
Thanks again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-05-15 22:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-05-14 9:23 [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 16:37 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2005-05-15 17:04 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-15 17:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 18:08 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-15 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 20:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2005-05-15 22:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-15 22:05 ` Andreas Jaeger
2005-05-16 1:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox