From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13465 invoked by alias); 15 May 2005 19:39:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13426 invoked from network); 15 May 2005 19:39:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 15 May 2005 19:39:41 -0000 Received: from zaretski (IGLD-80-230-75-75.inter.net.il [80.230.75.75]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.6-GR) with ESMTP id EJO55116 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 15 May 2005 22:37:54 +0300 (IDT) Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 19:46:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: "Joseph S. Myers" Message-ID: <01c55985$Blat.v2.4$50507620@zahav.net.il> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 CC: aj@suse.de, ian@airs.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (joseph@codesourcery.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix deftypefn in fopen_unlocked.c Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <01c55862$Blat.v2.4$44a795c0@zahav.net.il> X-SW-Source: 2005-05/txt/msg00383.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 17:25:15 +0000 (UTC) > From: "Joseph S. Myers" > cc: Ian Lance Taylor , Eli Zaretskii , > gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > functions.texi should be regenerated when committing this patches Right. I didn't do that, since I cannot commit changes to the GCC repository. > (and it should be verified that the new functions.texi does indeed > pass "make info" and "make dvi" before committing it). I verified the former before I submitted the patches. As for the latter, unless someone is going to preview the DVI output and make sure it looks okay in print, "make info" can be regarded as a good-enough test for "make dvi" as well.