From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] gdb: move commit_resume to process_stratum_target
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2021 20:29:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef47a376-7abf-59e9-1258-59fc369a0a5c@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108041734.3873826-4-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
On 08/01/21 04:17, Simon Marchi wrote:
> From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
>
> The following patch will change the commit_resume target method to
> something stateful. Because it would be difficult to track a state
> replicated in the various targets of a target stack, and since for the
> foreseeable future, only process stratum targets are going to use this
> concept, this patch makes the commit resume concept specific to process
> stratum targets.
>
> So, move the method to process_stratum_target, and move helper functions
> to process-stratum-target.h.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog:
>
> * target.h (struct target_ops) <commit_resume>: New.
> (target_commit_resume): Remove.
> (make_scoped_defer_target_commit_resume): Remove.
> * target.c (defer_target_commit_resume): Remove.
> (target_commit_resume): Remove.
> (make_scoped_defer_target_commit_resume): Remove.
> * process-stratum-target.h (class process_stratum_target)
> <commit_resume>: New.
> (maybe_commit_resume_all_process_targets): New.
> (make_scoped_defer_process_target_commit_resume): New.
> * process-stratum-target.c (defer_process_target_commit_resume):
> New.
> (maybe_commit_resume_process_target): New.
> (make_scoped_defer_process_target_commit_resume): New.
> * infrun.c (do_target_resume): Adjust.
> (commit_resume_all_targets): Rename into...
> (maybe_commit_resume_all_process_targets): ... this, adjust.
> (proceed): Adjust.
> * record-full.c (record_full_wait_1): Adjust.
> * target-delegates.c: Re-generate.
>
OK.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-09 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 4:17 [PATCH v3 0/5] Reduce back and forth with target when threads have pending statuses + better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] gdb: make the remote target track its own thread resume state Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:41 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 18:56 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 5:16 ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 6:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 10:36 ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 13:53 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace, full}.c Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace,full}.c Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 19:00 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] gdb: move commit_resume to process_stratum_target Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:01 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:29 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:34 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22 2:46 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22 22:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 17:14 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 18:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-15 19:17 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] gdb: better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:19 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:11 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 21:26 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:36 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 3:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-13 20:17 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-14 1:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef47a376-7abf-59e9-1258-59fc369a0a5c@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox