Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
	Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>,
	 gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:07:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d43e75e-4dd2-81f3-6b09-09bdd733be32@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617137d0-d740-c495-b7c1-9ad400ae617b@efficios.com>

On 2021-01-11 3:28 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2021-01-09 3:34 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> @@ -86,6 +77,35 @@ class process_stratum_target : public target_ops
>>>  
>>>    /* The connection number.  Visible in "info connections".  */
>>>    int connection_number = 0;
>>> +
>>> +  /* Whether resumed threads must be committed to the target.
>>> +
>>> +     When true, resumed threads must be committed to the execution target.
>>> +
>>> +     When false, the process stratum target may leave resumed threads stopped
>>> +     when it's convenient or efficient to do so.  When the core requires resumed
>>> +     threads to be committed again, this is set back to true and calls the
>>> +     `commit_resumed` method to allow the target to do so.
>>> +
>>> +     To simplify the implementation of process stratum targets, the following
>>> +     methods are guaranteed to be called with COMMIT_RESUMED_STATE set to
>>> +     false:
>>> +
>>> +       - resume
>>> +       - stop
>>> +       - wait
>>
>> Should we mention this in the documentation of each of these methods?
> 
> Yeah that would be nice.  Would you mention it in both places
> or just in those methods' documentation?

I just remembered why I put it there and not on the target methods.
Since commit-resumed is a concept specific to process targets, I don't
think that information belongs in struct target_ops, since it doesn't
make sense for other target_ops implementers.

Simon

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-08  4:17 [PATCH v3 0/5] Reduce back and forth with target when threads have pending statuses + better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08  4:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] gdb: make the remote target track its own thread resume state Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:41   ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 18:56     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18  5:16   ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18  6:04     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 10:36       ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 13:53         ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08  4:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace, full}.c Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:43   ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace,full}.c Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 19:00     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08  4:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] gdb: move commit_resume to process_stratum_target Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:12   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:01     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:29   ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-08  4:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:34   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:04     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:34   ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:28     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22  2:46       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22 22:07       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-01-12 17:14   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 18:04     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-15 19:17   ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08  4:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] gdb: better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:19   ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:11     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 21:26   ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:36     ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12  3:07       ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-13 20:17         ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-14  1:28           ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d43e75e-4dd2-81f3-6b09-09bdd733be32@polymtl.ca \
    --to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox