From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>,
Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 17:07:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d43e75e-4dd2-81f3-6b09-09bdd733be32@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <617137d0-d740-c495-b7c1-9ad400ae617b@efficios.com>
On 2021-01-11 3:28 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2021-01-09 3:34 p.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> @@ -86,6 +77,35 @@ class process_stratum_target : public target_ops
>>>
>>> /* The connection number. Visible in "info connections". */
>>> int connection_number = 0;
>>> +
>>> + /* Whether resumed threads must be committed to the target.
>>> +
>>> + When true, resumed threads must be committed to the execution target.
>>> +
>>> + When false, the process stratum target may leave resumed threads stopped
>>> + when it's convenient or efficient to do so. When the core requires resumed
>>> + threads to be committed again, this is set back to true and calls the
>>> + `commit_resumed` method to allow the target to do so.
>>> +
>>> + To simplify the implementation of process stratum targets, the following
>>> + methods are guaranteed to be called with COMMIT_RESUMED_STATE set to
>>> + false:
>>> +
>>> + - resume
>>> + - stop
>>> + - wait
>>
>> Should we mention this in the documentation of each of these methods?
>
> Yeah that would be nice. Would you mention it in both places
> or just in those methods' documentation?
I just remembered why I put it there and not on the target methods.
Since commit-resumed is a concept specific to process targets, I don't
think that information belongs in struct target_ops, since it doesn't
make sense for other target_ops implementers.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-08 4:17 [PATCH v3 0/5] Reduce back and forth with target when threads have pending statuses + better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] gdb: make the remote target track its own thread resume state Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:41 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 18:56 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 5:16 ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 6:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-18 10:36 ` Sebastian Huber
2021-01-18 13:53 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace, full}.c Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] gdb: remove target_ops::commit_resume implementation in record-{btrace,full}.c Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 19:00 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] gdb: move commit_resume to process_stratum_target Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:12 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:01 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:29 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] gdb: generalize commit_resume, avoid commit-resuming when threads have pending statuses Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:34 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 20:34 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22 2:46 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-22 22:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches [this message]
2021-01-12 17:14 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 18:04 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-15 19:17 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 4:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] gdb: better handling of 'S' packets Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-08 18:19 ` Andrew Burgess
2021-01-08 19:11 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-09 21:26 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-11 20:36 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-12 3:07 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
2021-01-13 20:17 ` Pedro Alves
2021-01-14 1:28 ` Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3d43e75e-4dd2-81f3-6b09-09bdd733be32@polymtl.ca \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox