From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>,
"Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] gdb: support for eBPF
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:00:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e743a918-e4db-16e7-3012-8af1deb63daf@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200805092112.GA853475@embecosm.com>
On 2020-08-05 5:21 a.m., Andrew Burgess wrote:
> I was thinking about this last night and I realised that "quality" was
> absolutely the wrong word for me to use, so I apologise for that.
>
> The issue here is not what is good (or quality) vs bad, which is what
> I implied. As you said, your code is perfectly valid C++.
>
> What I should have said is that your preferences don't take precedent
> over the projects agreed coding standard. There are many
> non-functional alternatives to the current coding standard, but
> people are not free to just go with their personal preferences. We
> all stick to some agreed rules, and hopefully, over time we end up
> with a consistent looking code base.
I completely agree with you, in practice I just didn't want to enter an argument about it.
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-05 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-03 14:02 [PATCH V6 0/3] eBPF support Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 1/3] gdb: support for eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-08-03 15:04 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:55 ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris
2020-08-03 15:52 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 16:00 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-03 16:46 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 13:41 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 14:57 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 16:29 ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 9:21 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-05 13:00 ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 2/3] sim: eBPF simulator Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 14:50 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 15:32 ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 3/3] sim: generated files for the " Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 13:51 ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 14:59 ` Jose E. Marchesi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e743a918-e4db-16e7-3012-8af1deb63daf@simark.ca \
--to=simark@simark.ca \
--cc=andrew.burgess@embecosm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox