Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com>
To: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 1/3] gdb: support for eBPF
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:55:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB28934767080FF05DFE61C17FC44D0@SN6PR11MB2893.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200803140237.14476-2-jose.marchesi@oracle.com>

On Monday, August 3, 2020 4:03 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> This patch adds basic support for the eBPF target: tdep and build
> machinery.  The accompanying simulator is introduced in subsequent
> patches.
>
> +/* Internal debugging facilities.  */
> +
> +/* When this is set to non-zero debugging information will be
> +   printed.  */
> +
> +static unsigned int bpf_debug_flag = 0;
> +
> +/* The show callback for 'show debug bpf'.  */
> +
> +static void
> +show_bpf_debug (struct ui_file *file, int from_tty,
> +	        struct cmd_list_element *c, const char *value)

Just my two cents.  The 'struct' keyword can be removed in numerous places
throughout the file.  Also, NULL can be replaced with nullptr.

> +{
> +  fprintf_filtered (file, _("Debugging of BPF is %s.\n"), value);
> +}
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* BPF registers */

Might look better with dot-space-space at the end.

> +
> +static const char *bpf_register_names[] =
> +{
> +  "r0",   "r1",  "r2",    "r3",   "r4",   "r5",   "r6",   "r7",
> +  "r8",   "r9",  "r10",   "pc"
> +};
> +
> +/* Return the name of register REGNUM.  */
> +
> +static const char *
> +bpf_register_name (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg)
> +{
> +  if (reg >= 0 && reg < BPF_NUM_REGS)
> +    return bpf_register_names[reg];
> +  return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the GDB type of register REGNUM.  */
> +
> +static struct type *
> +bpf_register_type (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg)
> +{
> +  if (reg == BPF_R10_REGNUM)
> +    return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_data_ptr;
> +  else if (reg == BPF_PC_REGNUM)
> +    return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_func_ptr;
> +  return builtin_type (gdbarch)->builtin_int64;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the GDB register number corresponding to DWARF's REG.  */
> +
> +static int
> +bpf_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int reg)
> +{
> +  if (reg >= 0 && reg < BPF_NUM_REGS)
> +    return reg;
> +  return -1;
> +}
> +
> +/* Implement the "print_insn" gdbarch method.  */
> +
> +static int
> +bpf_gdb_print_insn (bfd_vma memaddr, disassemble_info *info)
> +{
> +  info->symbols = NULL;
> +  return default_print_insn (memaddr, info);
> +}
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* Return PC of first real instruction of the function starting at
> +   START_PC.  */
> +
> +static CORE_ADDR
> +bpf_skip_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR start_pc)
> +{
> +  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> +		      "Skipping prologue: start_pc=%s\n",
> +		      paddress (gdbarch, start_pc));
> +  /* XXX: to be completed.  */
> +  return start_pc + 0;
> +}
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* Frame unwinder.
> +
> +   XXX it is not clear how to unwind in eBPF, since the stack is not
> +   guaranteed to be contiguous, and therefore no relative stack
> +   addressing can be done in the callee in order to access the
> +   caller's stack frame.  To explore with xBPF, which will relax this
> +   restriction.  */
> +
> +/* Given THIS_FRAME, return its ID.  */
> +
> +static void
> +bpf_frame_this_id (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> +		   void **this_prologue_cache,
> +		   struct frame_id *this_id)
> +{
> +  /* Note that THIS_ID defaults to the outermost frame if we don't set
> +     anything here.  See frame.c:compute_frame_id.  */
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the reason why we can't unwind past THIS_FRAME.  */
> +
> +static enum unwind_stop_reason
> +bpf_frame_unwind_stop_reason (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> +			      void **this_cache)
> +{
> +  return UNWIND_OUTERMOST;
> +}
> +
> +/* Ask THIS_FRAME to unwind its register.  */
> +
> +static struct value *
> +bpf_frame_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
> +			 void **this_prologue_cache, int regnum)
> +{
> +  return frame_unwind_got_register (this_frame, regnum, regnum);
> +}
> +
> +/* Frame unwinder machinery for BPF.  */
> +
> +static const struct frame_unwind bpf_frame_unwind =
> +{
> +  NORMAL_FRAME,
> +  bpf_frame_unwind_stop_reason,
> +  bpf_frame_this_id,
> +  bpf_frame_prev_register,
> +  NULL,
> +  default_frame_sniffer
> +};
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* Breakpoints.  */
> +
> +/* Enum describing the different kinds of breakpoints.  We currently
> +   just support one, implemented by the brkpt xbpf instruction.   */
> +
> +enum bpf_breakpoint_kinds
> +{
> +  BPF_BP_KIND_BRKPT = 0,
> +};
> +
> +/* Implement the breakpoint_kind_from_pc gdbarch method.  */
> +
> +static int
> +bpf_breakpoint_kind_from_pc (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR *start_pc)
> +{
> +  /* We support just one kind of breakpoint.  */
> +  return BPF_BP_KIND_BRKPT;
> +}
> +
> +/* Implement the sw_breakpoint_from_kind gdbarch method.  */
> +
> +static const gdb_byte *
> +bpf_sw_breakpoint_from_kind (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int kind, int *size)
> +{
> +  static unsigned char brkpt_insn[]
> +    = {0x8c, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00};
> +
> +  switch (kind)
> +    {
> +    case BPF_BP_KIND_BRKPT:
> +      *size = 8;
> +      return brkpt_insn;
> +    default:
> +      gdb_assert_not_reached ("unexpected BPF breakpoint kind");
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* Assuming THIS_FRAME is a dummy frame, return its frame ID.  */
> +
> +static struct frame_id
> +bpf_dummy_id (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct frame_info *this_frame)
> +{
> +  CORE_ADDR sp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame,
> +					      gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch));
> +  return frame_id_build (sp, get_frame_pc (this_frame));
> +}
> +
> +/* Implement the push dummy call gdbarch callback.  */
> +
> +static CORE_ADDR
> +bpf_push_dummy_call (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct value *function,
> +		     struct regcache *regcache, CORE_ADDR bp_addr,
> +		     int nargs, struct value **args, CORE_ADDR sp,
> +		     function_call_return_method return_method,
> +		     CORE_ADDR struct_addr)
> +{
> +  fprintf_unfiltered (gdb_stdlog,
> +		      "Pushing dummy call: sp=%s\n",

Is it necessary to break the line?

> +		      paddress (gdbarch, sp));
> +  /* XXX writeme  */
> +  return sp;
> +}
> +
> +/* Extract a function return value of TYPE from REGCACHE,
> +   and copy it into VALBUF.  */
> +
> +static void
> +bpf_extract_return_value (struct type *type, struct regcache *regcache,
> +			  gdb_byte *valbuf)
> +{
> +  int len = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
> +  gdb_byte vbuf[8];
> +
> +  gdb_assert (len <= 8);
> +  regcache->cooked_read (BPF_R0_REGNUM, vbuf);
> +  memcpy (valbuf, vbuf + 8 - len, len);
> +}
> +
> +/* Store the function return value of type TYPE from VALBUF into REGNAME.  */
> +
> +static void
> +bpf_store_return_value (struct type *type, struct regcache *regcache,
> +			const gdb_byte *valbuf)
> +{
> +  int len = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
> +  gdb_byte vbuf[8];
> +
> +  gdb_assert (len <= 8);
> +  memset (vbuf, 0, sizeof (vbuf));
> +  memcpy (vbuf + 8 - len, valbuf, len);
> +  regcache->cooked_write (BPF_R0_REGNUM, vbuf);
> +}
> +
> +/* Handle function's return value.  */
> +
> +static enum return_value_convention
> +bpf_return_value (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct value *function,
> +		  struct type *type, struct regcache *regcache,
> +		  gdb_byte *readbuf, const gdb_byte *writebuf)
> +{
> +  int len = TYPE_LENGTH (type);
> +
> +  if (len > 8)
> +    return RETURN_VALUE_STRUCT_CONVENTION;
> +
> +  if (readbuf != NULL)
> +    bpf_extract_return_value (type, regcache, readbuf);
> +  if (writebuf != NULL)
> +    bpf_store_return_value (type, regcache, writebuf);
> +
> +  return RETURN_VALUE_REGISTER_CONVENTION;
> +}
> +
> +
> 
> 
> +/* Initialize the current architecture based on INFO.  If possible, re-use an
> +   architecture from ARCHES, which is a list of architectures already created
> +   during this debugging session.  */
> +
> +static struct gdbarch *
> +bpf_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
> +{
> +  /* If there is already a candidate, use it.  */
> +  arches = gdbarch_list_lookup_by_info (arches, &info);
> +  if (arches != NULL)
> +    return arches->gdbarch;
> +
> +  /* Allocate space for the new architecture.  */
> +  struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep = XCNEW (struct gdbarch_tdep);
> +  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = gdbarch_alloc (&info, tdep);
> +
> +  /* Information about registers, etc.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_num_regs (gdbarch, BPF_NUM_REGS);
> +  set_gdbarch_register_name (gdbarch, bpf_register_name);
> +  set_gdbarch_register_type (gdbarch, bpf_register_type);
> +
> +  /* Register numbers of various important registers.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_sp_regnum (gdbarch, BPF_R10_REGNUM);
> +  set_gdbarch_pc_regnum (gdbarch, BPF_PC_REGNUM);
> +
> +  /* Map DWARF2 registers to GDB registers.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum (gdbarch, bpf_dwarf2_reg_to_regnum);
> +
> +  /* Call dummy code.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_call_dummy_location (gdbarch, ON_STACK);
> +  set_gdbarch_dummy_id (gdbarch, bpf_dummy_id);
> +  set_gdbarch_push_dummy_call (gdbarch, bpf_push_dummy_call);
> +
> +  /* Returning results.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_return_value (gdbarch, bpf_return_value);
> +
> +  /* Advance PC across function entry code.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_skip_prologue (gdbarch, bpf_skip_prologue);
> +
> +  /* Stack grows downward.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, core_addr_lessthan);
> +
> +  /* Breakpoint manipulation.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_breakpoint_kind_from_pc (gdbarch, bpf_breakpoint_kind_from_pc);
> +  set_gdbarch_sw_breakpoint_from_kind (gdbarch, bpf_sw_breakpoint_from_kind);
> +
> +  /* Frame handling.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_frame_args_skip (gdbarch, 8);
> +
> +  /* Disassembly.  */
> +  set_gdbarch_print_insn (gdbarch, bpf_gdb_print_insn);
> +
> +  /* Hook in ABI-specific overrides, if they have been registered.  */
> +  gdbarch_init_osabi (info, gdbarch);
> +
> +  /* Install unwinders.  */
> +  frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &bpf_frame_unwind);
> +
> +  return gdbarch;
> +}
> +
> +void _initialize_bpf_tdep ();
> +void
> +_initialize_bpf_tdep (void)
> +{
> +  register_gdbarch_init (bfd_arch_bpf, bpf_gdbarch_init);
> +
> +  /* Add commands 'set/show debug bpf'  */

Dot-space-space at the end of the comment.

Thanks.
-Baris


Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Gary Kershaw
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-03 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-03 14:02 [PATCH V6 0/3] eBPF support Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 1/3] gdb: support for eBPF Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:52   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-08-03 15:04     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:55   ` Aktemur, Tankut Baris [this message]
2020-08-03 15:52     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 16:00       ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-03 16:46         ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 13:41       ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 14:57         ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 16:29           ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05  9:21           ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-05 13:00             ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 2/3] sim: eBPF simulator Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 14:50   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 15:32     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-03 14:02 ` [PATCH V6 3/3] sim: generated files for the " Jose E. Marchesi
2020-08-04 13:51   ` Andrew Burgess
2020-08-04 14:59     ` Jose E. Marchesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB28934767080FF05DFE61C17FC44D0@SN6PR11MB2893.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox