Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] gdb: support for eBPF

["Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>]

>> I prefer to write (and maintain) C.
>> 
>
> Just pretend that you've done
>
> typedef struct {
>   ...
> } foo;
>
> instead of
>
> struct foo
> {
>   ...
> };
>
> and there there is
>
> #define nullptr NULL
>
> :)

Well, I'm not that sure these equivalences are actually homomorphic but
that's precisely the point: I would rather not have to figure it out XD

> FWIW, I agree with Baris on that, but it's not something worth
> fighting over, especially for tdep code.  As long as you maintain it,
> I think it's ok to have a bit of artistic freedom.  For common code,
> we probably want to enforce a more consistent style though.

Thanks, much appreciated.