Re: [SH] regs command

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>]

On Wed, 16 May 2012, Joel Brobecker wrote:

> > This means you registered "regs" before the thing it aliases was
> > registered.  This can happen because _initialize_xxx order is not
> > defined.
> > 
> > There's no easy fix :(.  You could move "regs" initialization to a
> > better spot but then it will be visible in all builds of gdb, not just
> > those with this target compiled in.
> 
> It seems better in that case to just go with what Thomas had initially,
> maybe just adding a comment why we don't use an alias?  It's only for
> a few weeks...

 I think a fix is actually very easy.  All that has to be done is to tweak 
the init.c scriptery such that *_tdep initialisers are run last.  And 
actually I think it is worth the while regardless of this particular issue 
as this way all the target-dependent bits can rely on generic stuff to 
have been initialised.

 Of course tweaking the scriptery can be horribly boring, but there you 
go.  I'll see if I can give it a shot -- unless anyone beats me to it.

  Maciej