From: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,
thomas@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org,
kevinb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [SH] regs command
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB642E4.6050106@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.1205181247550.11227@tp.orcam.me.uk>
On 05/18/2012 01:22 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> static struct target_so_ops mips_svr4_so_ops;
> [...]
>
> /* Initialize this lazily, to avoid an initialization order
> dependency on solib-svr4.c's _initialize routine. */
> if (mips_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code == NULL)
> {
> mips_svr4_so_ops = svr4_so_ops;
> mips_svr4_so_ops.in_dynsym_resolve_code
> = mips_linux_in_dynsym_resolve_code;
> }
> set_solib_ops (gdbarch, &mips_svr4_so_ops);
>
> that I find all but clean -- I can't even tell straight away, without
> studying all the code involved and perhaps experimenting, if this indeed
> is going to work correctly regardless of whether this is run before or
> after the other piece referred.
solib-svr4.c is as much target dependent as mips-linux-tdep.c though.
The split on file name is a bit arbitrary. It'd make a bit more sense
to split around something like COMMON_OBS and TARGET_OBJS, but you'd
still bump into such issues. A "don't depend on order" rule appears
simpler to understand and maintain than having to worry about
hierarchies.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 13:56 Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 14:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 16:32 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 16:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 17:21 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-16 19:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 19:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 0:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-17 11:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 12:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-17 15:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-17 15:45 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-17 19:52 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-17 20:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-18 12:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-18 12:39 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2012-05-18 12:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-18 13:33 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-18 13:47 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-21 23:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-24 18:05 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-17 19:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-05-16 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-16 18:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-16 19:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-06-06 18:10 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-08-10 9:22 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-08-10 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB642E4.6050106@redhat.com \
--to=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox