From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: macro@codesourcery.com, thomas@codesourcery.com,
tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, kevinb@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [SH] regs command
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:45:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120517154502.GE10253@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201205171522.q4HFMWGM026439@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
> It's not obvious that such a hierarchy is the right one. I'd put the
> -tdep files before the -nat file for example. And I can imagine a
> scenario where you'd actually wanted the generic ones to come *after*
> the -tdep ones.
OK. I think the point is not to try to find the best order, but
to provide some specified order.
> Frankly, I would just remove the command in question, since it should
> never have been there in the first place.
It's not much trouble going through the deprecation phase, and it is
much friendlier to the users who might have been using this command.
But I wouldn't oppose deleting the command outright, on the basis
that it should be relatively trivial for the users to find the correct
command.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 13:56 Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 14:26 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 16:32 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 16:58 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 17:21 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-05-16 18:47 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-16 19:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-16 19:38 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 0:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 11:10 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-17 11:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-17 12:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-17 15:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-05-17 15:45 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2012-05-17 19:52 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-17 20:38 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-18 12:23 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-18 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-18 12:49 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-05-18 13:33 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-18 13:47 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-21 23:36 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2012-05-24 18:05 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-17 19:32 ` Kevin Buettner
2012-05-16 18:36 ` Tom Tromey
2012-05-16 18:36 ` Pedro Alves
2012-05-16 19:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-06-06 18:10 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-08-10 9:22 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-08-10 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120517154502.GE10253@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=macro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox