Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC] An initial patch for PR/1961
@ 2005-06-20  1:56 Wu Zhou
  2005-07-03 19:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wu Zhou @ 2005-06-20  1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches

Hello all,

I did some initial analysis against PR/1961 (Pls add a test for command 
input of "-(" ).  I found this SEGV error will also pop when issuing "+)", 
"<)", ">(" and so on under gdbtui. 

My intial patch is attached as follows.  Please review.  Thanks.

2005-06-20  Wu Zhou  <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>

	* tui/tui-win.c (parse_scrolling_args): Fix SEGV error with invalid
	scroll command.

Index: tui/tui-win.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/tui/tui-win.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -c -p -r1.25 tui-win.c
*** tui/tui-win.c	24 Feb 2005 13:51:36 -0000	1.25
--- tui/tui-win.c	20 Jun 2005 01:43:59 -0000
*************** parse_scrolling_args (char *arg, struct 
*** 1543,1549 ****
  
  	  if (*win_to_scroll == (struct tui_win_info *) NULL ||
  	      !(*win_to_scroll)->generic.is_visible)
! 	    warning (_("Invalid window specified. \n\
  The window name specified must be valid and visible.\n"));
  	  else if (*win_to_scroll == TUI_CMD_WIN)
  	    *win_to_scroll = (struct tui_win_info *) (tui_source_windows ())->list[0];
--- 1543,1549 ----
  
  	  if (*win_to_scroll == (struct tui_win_info *) NULL ||
  	      !(*win_to_scroll)->generic.is_visible)
! 	    error (_("Invalid window specified. \n\
  The window name specified must be valid and visible.\n"));
  	  else if (*win_to_scroll == TUI_CMD_WIN)
  	    *win_to_scroll = (struct tui_win_info *) (tui_source_windows ())->list[0];


Cheers
- Wu Zhou


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] An initial patch for PR/1961
  2005-06-20  1:56 [RFC] An initial patch for PR/1961 Wu Zhou
@ 2005-07-03 19:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
  2005-07-06  7:50   ` Wu Zhou
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2005-07-03 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wu Zhou; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:02:14AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I did some initial analysis against PR/1961 (Pls add a test for command 
> input of "-(" ).  I found this SEGV error will also pop when issuing "+)", 
> "<)", ">(" and so on under gdbtui. 
> 
> My intial patch is attached as follows.  Please review.  Thanks.
> 
> 2005-06-20  Wu Zhou  <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> 
> 	* tui/tui-win.c (parse_scrolling_args): Fix SEGV error with invalid
> 	scroll command.

Please update the copyright year in this file.  Otherwise, this patch
is OK.  Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC] An initial patch for PR/1961
  2005-07-03 19:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2005-07-06  7:50   ` Wu Zhou
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wu Zhou @ 2005-07-06  7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches

On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 12:02:14AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > I did some initial analysis against PR/1961 (Pls add a test for command 
> > input of "-(" ).  I found this SEGV error will also pop when issuing "+)", 
> > "<)", ">(" and so on under gdbtui. 
> > 
> > My intial patch is attached as follows.  Please review.  Thanks.
> > 
> > 2005-06-20  Wu Zhou  <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> > 
> > 	* tui/tui-win.c (parse_scrolling_args): Fix SEGV error with invalid
> > 	scroll command.
> 
> Please update the copyright year in this file.  Otherwise, this patch
> is OK.  Thanks!

Copyright year is updated and patch committed.

BTW.  I ever thought of adding a testcase to verify this, but found that 
gdb will timeout while waiting for the tui output under expect's control.
Is there any method to work around this?  More generally, is there any way 
to test TUI interface using expect? (I don't find any tests for TUI under 
the testsuite directory.)  Maybe it is desirable for TUI to receive enough 
test just like what MI had done. 

Just my two cents anyway.  Comments are highly appreciated.

Cheers
- Wu Zhou


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-06  7:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-20  1:56 [RFC] An initial patch for PR/1961 Wu Zhou
2005-07-03 19:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-06  7:50   ` Wu Zhou

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox