Re: [PATCH 22/348] Fix -Wsahdow warnings

[Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:

> For reference sake, I did "grep -e -Wall ChangeLog*" to see what's
> been done in the past.  Based on that there is room for compromise I think.
>
> Since these are just mechanical changes, and there are a lot of them,
> I'd be happy with a compromise everyone is happy (or at least
> not unhappy :-)) with.
>
> I think keeping them at the file level is easiest for you (just
> guessing though).
> And I'd be happy with a changelog entry that simply said:
>
>        * foo.c: -Wshadow lint.
>
> or
>
>        * foo.c (bar, baz): -Wshadow lint.
>        (huey,dewey,louie): Ditto.
>

I changed(after it was pointed out that they do not conform to GNU
policy) the style of my ChangeLog entries to

        * 42.c (trillian): Rename zaphod to beeblebrox(-Wshadow).

Hope this is a reasonable compromise everyone would be OK with. If
anyone have any other suggestions -- I'm all ears.

Andrey Smirnov

P.S. Just for the future reference, because English is not my first
language I expect some of the ChangeLog messages to be awkwardly
phrased. If that's the case feel free to nudge me about it and I'll
correct it(please do provide suggestions for correction).