From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python Scripting] New method gdb.Architecture.disassemble
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gw0aKKNeNND_AAf5ZCDpqsQff_+bib0r63G-gtP2jECkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Txs4KJ8oQmCTmFpjoUFOBsannfCnr6ZxY3OWLH7GXxDg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> Oh, duh. Sorry for the followup.
> This needs a NEWS entry.
There is an entry in the NEWS file:
** New method Frame.architecture returns the gdb.Architecture object
corresponding to the frame's architecture.
Adding a new entry for this new method on gdb.Architecture might not
be good idea? I can of course modify to say, "... gdb.Architecture
object corresponding to the frame's architecture with methods 'name'
and 'disassemble'.", but it doesn't sound that very nice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 14:09 Siva Chandra
2013-02-05 23:28 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-06 1:53 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-06 20:00 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-08 18:05 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-09 17:55 ` Matt Rice
2013-02-12 14:56 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-12 21:18 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-13 14:37 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-13 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-13 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-13 19:50 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-13 20:42 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-14 22:46 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 6:43 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-15 17:32 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-15 17:40 ` Siva Chandra [this message]
2013-02-15 17:41 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 18:57 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-15 20:36 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 21:01 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-16 5:30 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-16 8:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-19 5:36 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-19 15:51 ` Paul_Koning
2013-02-19 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-19 16:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-20 12:34 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-20 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-21 1:49 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-06 19:58 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-06 20:31 ` Phil Muldoon
2013-02-06 22:31 ` Matt Rice
2013-02-06 23:19 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 1:11 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 23:03 ` Matt Rice
[not found] ` <20130206235707.GA2353@klara.mpi.htwm.de>
2013-02-07 1:18 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 14:14 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGyQ6gw0aKKNeNND_AAf5ZCDpqsQff_+bib0r63G-gtP2jECkg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sivachandra@google.com \
--cc=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox