From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-98550-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21381 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2013 17:40:29 -0000
Received: (qmail 21368 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2013 17:40:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.4 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com (HELO mail-ee0-f50.google.com) (74.125.83.50)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:40:18 +0000
Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id e51so2061923eek.37        for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=google.com; s=20120113;        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state;        bh=Fy7+GaxAGpv4dOOjn3seilaOvYM9MOSix29KcnMsiu0=;        b=cfV0WrFhfiNwfec0ukj0d7ZzHkAuT+sss9vC1sNw4quS7SypfTkW66WEyDVPLqgNcy         gydyBXt+Kin3XLWUVA3wbhoYHWMWseh/QCae3WdbIwyLrkCpBOwVhvR+lvIm7XEuTVR3         b8G9ZZizHXzl3SW5h25sfDCE6SAOUZ72GP5+XxCj/bRtMZ3BSyFB2rs8COH15dC3jBZC         TwizfsinGm61R7KiT0GlhC/9gp8HupkRpllI6j1r+QZWUlpfeyKQmXz8q70Hx7ws8tGm         Ioa3QV3NfeSydhvQJyl1be0fbIbCC8872vwjAGO4CGICHsWLLHoe4WWgTy+2QZzsRqd0         TdQg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.14.184.68 with SMTP id r44mr10356916eem.40.1360950016723; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.207.195 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:40:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADPb22Txs4KJ8oQmCTmFpjoUFOBsannfCnr6ZxY3OWLH7GXxDg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAGyQ6gy_08hZn2Pk6pmD+AuOkH7SCsQ6732KTa7sucZ7-4prUA@mail.gmail.com>	<20753.38272.55066.651097@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CAGyQ6gy68LdCd_qxDX7vinMg-Pb6qnukGScOw2uzgezxKxh_TA@mail.gmail.com>	<CADPb22TGJNFg7VJkeoTB7Ctd=K2Tc490LKo_mdUVXFF2K6TV5g@mail.gmail.com>	<CAGyQ6gweW=9L4mVCkFetd+LvvpjSYzYKM78mYDu5HfG1LpVwiQ@mail.gmail.com>	<87txphmdt3.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAGyQ6gzSs617BRcreAGA5418EpXaqCaPN8ZzKjQYNx9yxDSJRA@mail.gmail.com>	<87r4kkks5g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAGyQ6gwSnFH3OKHSpNxVmVxRRRM61c=T=euhJg6hyFL7+88ecg@mail.gmail.com>	<20763.64197.459891.627211@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CAGyQ6gxOqnD0tr+rR2kuYBr6ub6vN8DvGG5PxA+BO-O8VYXVqA@mail.gmail.com>	<20765.55532.700460.792597@ruffy2.mtv.corp.google.com>	<CADPb22Txs4KJ8oQmCTmFpjoUFOBsannfCnr6ZxY3OWLH7GXxDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 17:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAGyQ6gw0aKKNeNND_AAf5ZCDpqsQff_+bib0r63G-gtP2jECkg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python Scripting] New method gdb.Architecture.disassemble
From: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, 	Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk318JyZIRr8vQ98QgiE4B4Qo6/KBtPeOOU1UZixo8ydq+xVMbTyIhcLY2ClZP7av4Kjb1IOQ4E8cdEBWrArzo9GffRBWQz7rh4WzGh/GfEvnmu/AZRTBJgcNKj71lvgJPSdWKARBTeqdRE76Ndu0lmtCTSxn1VOtFU1nWqnm6eR0U4Of81dcSwJyM0bIp6wvi7PsL5hbKCWqMwchYzB90TVgICRw==
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-02/txt/msg00400.txt.bz2

On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> Oh, duh.  Sorry for the followup.
> This needs a NEWS entry.

There is an entry in the NEWS file:

** New method Frame.architecture returns the gdb.Architecture object
     corresponding to the frame's architecture.

Adding a new entry for this new method on gdb.Architecture might not
be good idea?  I can of course modify to say, "...  gdb.Architecture
object corresponding to the frame's architecture with methods 'name'
and 'disassemble'.", but it doesn't sound that very nice.