From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
To: Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC - Python Scripting] New method gdb.Architecture.disassemble
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 18:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADPb22SR_E5JnUCOdV0v5_Ki3cFBdLRUjnLt-S9x0NEuKag4Xw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGyQ6gw0aKKNeNND_AAf5ZCDpqsQff_+bib0r63G-gtP2jECkg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Siva Chandra <sivachandra@google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>> Oh, duh. Sorry for the followup.
>> This needs a NEWS entry.
>
> There is an entry in the NEWS file:
>
> ** New method Frame.architecture returns the gdb.Architecture object
> corresponding to the frame's architecture.
>
> Adding a new entry for this new method on gdb.Architecture might not
> be good idea? I can of course modify to say, "... gdb.Architecture
> object corresponding to the frame's architecture with methods 'name'
> and 'disassemble'.", but it doesn't sound that very nice.
Ah.
I guess whether to add another one for disassemble is debatable then.
Ok with me to leave out the NEWS entry then.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-15 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 14:09 Siva Chandra
2013-02-05 23:28 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-06 1:53 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-06 20:00 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-08 18:05 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-09 17:55 ` Matt Rice
2013-02-12 14:56 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-12 21:18 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-13 14:37 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-13 17:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-13 18:03 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-13 19:50 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-13 20:42 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-14 22:46 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 6:43 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-15 17:32 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-15 17:40 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 17:41 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 18:57 ` Doug Evans [this message]
2013-02-15 20:36 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-15 21:01 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-16 5:30 ` Doug Evans
2013-02-16 8:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-19 5:36 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-19 15:51 ` Paul_Koning
2013-02-19 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-19 16:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-20 12:34 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-20 18:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-02-21 1:49 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-06 19:58 ` Tom Tromey
2013-02-06 20:31 ` Phil Muldoon
2013-02-06 22:31 ` Matt Rice
2013-02-06 23:19 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 1:11 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 23:03 ` Matt Rice
[not found] ` <20130206235707.GA2353@klara.mpi.htwm.de>
2013-02-07 1:18 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 14:14 ` Siva Chandra
2013-02-07 16:42 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CADPb22SR_E5JnUCOdV0v5_Ki3cFBdLRUjnLt-S9x0NEuKag4Xw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dje@google.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sivachandra@google.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox