Re: [PATCH 4/4] Add $_ada_exception convenience variable

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 08:52:35 -0600
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index 2cc82e86560..7379fd78b41 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
>    provide the exitcode or exit status of the shell commands launched by
>    GDB commands such as "shell", "pipe" and "make".
>  
> +* New convenience variable $_ada_exception holds the address of the
> +  Ada exception being thrown.  This is set by Ada-related catchpoints.
> +

This part is OK.

> diff --git a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> index 55be2ef6920..1a69c444e37 100644
> --- a/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> +++ b/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo
> @@ -4695,10 +4695,18 @@ called @code{Constraint_Error} is defined in package @code{Pck}, then
>  the command to use to catch such exceptions is @kbd{catch exception
>  Pck.Constraint_Error}.
>  
> +The convenience variable @code{$_ada_exception} holds the address of
> +the exception being thrown.  This can be useful when setting a
> +condition for such a catchpoint.
> +
>  @item exception unhandled
>  @kindex catch exception unhandled
>  An exception that was raised but is not handled by the program.
>  
> +The convenience variable @code{$_ada_exception} holds the address of
> +the exception being thrown.  This can be useful when setting a
> +condition for such a catchpoint.
> +
>  @item handlers @r{[}@var{name}@r{]}
>  @kindex catch handlers
>  @cindex Ada exception handlers catching
> @@ -4719,9 +4727,14 @@ user-defined one.  For instance, assuming an exception called
>  command to use to catch such exceptions handling is
>  @kbd{catch handlers Pck.Constraint_Error}.
>  
> +The convenience variable @code{$_ada_exception} holds the address of
> +the exception being thrown.  This can be useful when setting a
> +condition for such a catchpoint.

Here I wonder why we need to have the exact same text 3 times within
less than 25 lines.  Can't we say this only once?

Otherwise the documentation parts are fine, thanks.