From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra error message from update_watchpoint
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5270F23E.7010602@broadcom.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:49:18 +0000
> From: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> OK, here are a few alternatives, feel free to pick your favourites:
>
> (1) The original:
> error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported."));
>
> (2) Pedro's original replacement:
> error (_("Hardware watchpoint support disabled. "
> "See set/show can-use-hw-watchpoints."));
>
> (3) The original + why we can't use H/W watchpoints (bit long):
> error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported, "
> "re-enable hardware watchpoints using "
> "\"set can-use-hw-watchpoints 1\""));
>
> (4) Same, but with a newline to keep it under 80 chars, not sure if
> multi-line errors are acceptable though.
> error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported.\n"
> "Enable hardware watchpoints using "
> "\"set can-use-hw-watchpoints 1\""));
>
> (5) Mention that H/W watchpoints are disabled, but not how to re-enable
> them, though given the user has done the disabling this might be enough
> to prompt them. This is single line, and just under 80 chars.
> error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported, "
> "hardware watchpoints disabled."));
>
>
> My favourite is (5) at the moment, but I'll take whatever makes everyone
> else happy :)
None of the above really explains to the user why GDB is going to
refuse to abide by her command.
A good message should say something like "Cannot do SOMETHING because
SOME-REASON."
But I don't want to be in the position of blocking a commit due to
something that is just MO, so feel free to ignore me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 9:20 Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 17:18 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 16:44 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-29 17:09 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-29 17:38 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-29 17:52 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-30 11:49 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 15:41 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-10-30 17:13 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:41 ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-31 13:05 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:48 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-30 19:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox