Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@broadcom.com>
Cc: palves@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra error message from update_watchpoint
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5270F23E.7010602@broadcom.com>

> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:49:18 +0000
> From: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> OK, here are a few alternatives, feel free to pick your favourites:
> 
> (1) The original:
>     error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported."));
> 
> (2) Pedro's original replacement:
>     error (_("Hardware watchpoint support disabled.  "
>              "See set/show can-use-hw-watchpoints."));
> 
> (3) The original + why we can't use H/W watchpoints (bit long):
>     error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported, "
>              "re-enable hardware watchpoints using "
>              "\"set can-use-hw-watchpoints 1\""));
> 
> (4) Same, but with a newline to keep it under 80 chars, not sure if
> multi-line errors are acceptable though.
>     error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported.\n"
>              "Enable hardware watchpoints using "
>              "\"set can-use-hw-watchpoints 1\""));
> 
> (5) Mention that H/W watchpoints are disabled, but not how to re-enable
> them, though given the user has done the disabling this might be enough
> to prompt them.  This is single line, and just under 80 chars.
>     error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported, "
>              "hardware watchpoints disabled."));
> 
> 
> My favourite is (5) at the moment, but I'll take whatever makes everyone
> else happy :)

None of the above really explains to the user why GDB is going to
refuse to abide by her command.

A good message should say something like "Cannot do SOMETHING because
SOME-REASON."

But I don't want to be in the position of blocking a commit due to
something that is just MO, so feel free to ignore me.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-30 15:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-18  9:20 Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 17:18 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 16:44   ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-29 17:09     ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 17:19     ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-29 17:38       ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-29 17:52         ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 19:09           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-30 11:49         ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 15:41           ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2013-10-30 17:13             ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:41               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-31 13:05                 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:48               ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-30 19:19                 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a9hqepgt.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=aburgess@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox