Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
To: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>,	palves@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extra error message from update_watchpoint
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <526FF27B.8090209@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83ob68dmfb.fsf@gnu.org>

On 29/10/2013 5:19 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 16:44:25 +0000
>> From: "Andrew Burgess" <aburgess@broadcom.com>
>> cc: "Pedro Alves" <palves@redhat.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
>> index 608463d..68b348d 100644
>> --- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
>> +++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
>> @@ -1805,7 +1805,8 @@ update_watchpoint (struct watchpoint *b, int reparse)
>>  	  if (b->base.ops->works_in_software_mode (&b->base))
>>  	    b->base.type = bp_watchpoint;
>>  	  else
>> -	    error (_("Software read/access watchpoints not supported."));
>> +	    error (_("Hardware watchpoint support disabled.  "
>> +		     "See set/show can-use-hw-watchpoints."));
> 
> Sorry for chiming in late, but IMO this change is a step backwards:
> the new warning is much more puzzling than the old one.  The old one
> at least told what was the problem, the new one looks like entirely
> unrelated (unless you are privy to GDB internals).
> 
> How about something like
> 
>   Cannot set read/access watchpoints without hardware watchpoint support.


If Pedro is happy then I too am happy, my original issue was for the
case where turning H/W watchpoints off resulted in the error:
  Expression cannot be implemented with read/access watchpoint.

which confused me.  Anything that's been suggested so far is better than
the original behaviour :)

thanks,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-29 17:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-18  9:20 Andrew Burgess
2013-10-18 17:18 ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 16:44   ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-29 17:09     ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 17:19     ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-29 17:38       ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2013-10-29 17:52         ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-29 19:09           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-30 11:49         ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 15:41           ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-30 17:13             ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:41               ` Eli Zaretskii
2013-10-31 13:05                 ` Andrew Burgess
2013-10-30 18:48               ` Pedro Alves
2013-10-30 19:19                 ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=526FF27B.8090209@broadcom.com \
    --to=aburgess@broadcom.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=palves@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox