From: Lancelot SIX <Lancelot.Six@amd.com>
To: Tankut Baris Aktemur <tankutbaris.aktemur@amd.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb, amd-dbgapi-target: use PRIu64 and PRIu32
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 16:16:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ae6dd2b-9577-4711-a0c8-93663a28e997@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701142846.2566570-1-tankutbaris.aktemur@amd.com>
Hi,
Doesn't GDB have an implicit habit/policy not to use the PRI??? macros?
I do not mind them in amd-dbgapi-target.c, but want to make sure global
maintainers are fine with this.
I guess the alternative is to use pulongest + %s instead of PRIu64.
i.e. something like this:
str += (agent_id != AMD_DBGAPI_AGENT_NONE
? string_printf (" %s", pulongest (agent_id.handle))
: "?");
Lancelot.
On 01/07/2026 15:28, Tankut Baris Aktemur wrote:
> In amd-dbgapi-target, there are a number of cases where uint64_t and
> uint32_t types are being printed. The uint64_t cases are in
> particular about identifier handles obtained from the debug API. For
> portability, use PRIu64 for uint64_t and PRIu32 for uint32_t values.
>
> In one case, `ptid.tid ()` was being printed for the wave id. Change
> this to use `wave_id.handle` for consistency with the other cases.
> ---
> gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c b/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> index d0424044e0c..14523fcefb3 100644
> --- a/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> +++ b/gdb/amd-dbgapi-target.c
> @@ -392,26 +392,26 @@ wave_coordinates::to_string () const
> std::string str = "AMDGPU Wave";
>
> str += (agent_id != AMD_DBGAPI_AGENT_NONE
> - ? string_printf (" %ld", agent_id.handle)
> + ? string_printf (" %" PRIu64, agent_id.handle)
> : " ?");
>
> str += (queue_id != AMD_DBGAPI_QUEUE_NONE
> - ? string_printf (":%ld", queue_id.handle)
> + ? string_printf (":%" PRIu64, queue_id.handle)
> : ":?");
>
> str += (dispatch_id != AMD_DBGAPI_DISPATCH_NONE
> - ? string_printf (":%ld", dispatch_id.handle)
> + ? string_printf (":%" PRIu64, dispatch_id.handle)
> : ":?");
>
> - str += string_printf (":%ld", wave_id.handle);
> + str += string_printf (":%" PRIu64, wave_id.handle);
>
> str += (group_ids[0] != UINT32_MAX
> - ? string_printf (" (%d,%d,%d)", group_ids[0], group_ids[1],
> - group_ids[2])
> + ? string_printf (" (%" PRIu32 ",%" PRIu32 ",%" PRIu32 ")",
> + group_ids[0], group_ids[1], group_ids[2])
> : " (?,?,?)");
>
> str += (wave_in_group != UINT32_MAX
> - ? string_printf ("/%d", wave_in_group)
> + ? string_printf ("/%" PRIu32, wave_in_group)
> : "/?");
>
> return str;
> @@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ amd_dbgapi_target_breakpoint::check_status (struct bpstat *bs)
> &action);
>
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("amd_dbgapi_report_breakpoint_hit failed for breakpoint %ld "
> - "at %s (%s)"),
> + error (_("amd_dbgapi_report_breakpoint_hit failed for breakpoint %" PRIu64
> + " at %s (%s)"),
> breakpoint_id.handle, paddress (inf->arch (), bs->bp_location_at->address),
> get_status_string (status));
>
> @@ -624,7 +624,7 @@ amd_dbgapi_target_breakpoint::check_status (struct bpstat *bs)
> for our breakpoint_id. */
> if (resume_breakpoint_id != breakpoint_id)
> error (_("breakpoint resume event is not for this breakpoint. "
> - "Expected breakpoint_%ld, got breakpoint_%ld"),
> + "Expected breakpoint_%" PRIu64 ", got breakpoint_%" PRIu64),
> breakpoint_id.handle, resume_breakpoint_id.handle);
>
> amd_dbgapi_event_processed (resume_event_id);
> @@ -1055,8 +1055,8 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::resume (ptid_t scope_ptid, int step, enum gdb_signal signo)
> indicate that the process has exited. GDB treats resuming a
> thread that no longer exists as being successful. */
> && status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_WAVE_ID)
> - error (_("wave_resume for wave_%ld failed (%s)"), wave_id.handle,
> - get_status_string (status));
> + error (_("wave_resume for wave_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> + wave_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> wi.stopping = false;
> }
> @@ -1130,12 +1130,12 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::stop (ptid_t ptid)
> }
>
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_WAVE_ID)
> - error (_("wave_stop for wave_%ld failed (%s)"), wave_id.handle,
> - get_status_string (status));
> + error (_("wave_stop for wave_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> + wave_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
> }
> else if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_WAVE_ID)
> - error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%ld failed (%s)"), wave_id.handle,
> - get_status_string (status));
> + error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> + wave_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> /* The status is AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_WAVE_ID. The wave
> could have terminated since the last time the wave list was
> @@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::stop (ptid_t ptid)
> wi.stopping = true;
>
> amd_dbgapi_debug_printf ("got AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_ERROR_INVALID_WAVE_ID "
> - "for wave_%ld, last_resume_mode=%s, "
> + "for wave_%" PRIu64 ", last_resume_mode=%s, "
> "report_thread_events=%d",
> wave_id.handle,
> resume_mode_to_string (wi.last_resume_mode),
> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ dbgapi_notifier_handler (int err, gdb_client_data client_data)
> sizeof (runtime_state),
> &runtime_state);
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("event_get_info for event_%ld failed (%s)"),
> + error (_("event_get_info for event_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> event_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> switch (runtime_state)
> @@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ add_gpu_thread (inferior *inf, ptid_t wave_ptid)
>
> if (!info.wave_info_map.try_emplace (wave_id.handle,
> wave_info (wave_id)).second)
> - internal_error ("wave ID %ld already in map", wave_id.handle);
> + internal_error ("wave ID %" PRIu64 " already in map", wave_id.handle);
>
> /* Create new GPU threads silently to avoid spamming the terminal
> with thousands of "[New Thread ...]" messages. */
> @@ -1436,7 +1436,7 @@ process_one_event (amd_dbgapi_inferior_info &info,
> = amd_dbgapi_event_get_info (event_id, AMD_DBGAPI_EVENT_INFO_WAVE,
> sizeof (wave_id), &wave_id);
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("event_get_info for event_%ld failed (%s)"),
> + error (_("event_get_info for event_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> event_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> ptid_t event_ptid = make_gpu_ptid (info.inf->pid, wave_id);
> @@ -1502,7 +1502,7 @@ process_one_event (amd_dbgapi_inferior_info &info,
> }
> }
> else
> - error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%ld failed (%s)"),
> + error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> wave_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> info.wave_events.emplace_back (event_ptid, ws);
> @@ -1542,7 +1542,7 @@ process_one_event (amd_dbgapi_inferior_info &info,
> AMD_DBGAPI_EVENT_INFO_RUNTIME_STATE,
> sizeof (runtime_state), &runtime_state);
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("event_get_info for event_%ld failed (%s)"),
> + error (_("event_get_info for event_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> event_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> gdb_assert (runtime_state == AMD_DBGAPI_RUNTIME_STATE_UNLOADED);
> @@ -2069,14 +2069,14 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::thread_architecture (ptid_t ptid)
> sizeof (architecture_id),
> &architecture_id);
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("Couldn't get architecture for wave_%ld"), ptid.tid ());
> + error (_("Couldn't get architecture for wave_%" PRIu64), wave_id.handle);
>
> uint32_t elf_amdgpu_machine;
> status = amd_dbgapi_architecture_get_info
> (architecture_id, AMD_DBGAPI_ARCHITECTURE_INFO_ELF_AMDGPU_MACHINE,
> sizeof (elf_amdgpu_machine), &elf_amdgpu_machine);
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("Couldn't get elf_amdgpu_machine for architecture_%ld"),
> + error (_("Couldn't get elf_amdgpu_machine for architecture_%" PRIu64),
> architecture_id.handle);
>
> struct gdbarch_info info;
> @@ -2154,7 +2154,7 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::update_thread_list ()
> || wi.stopping)
> {
> amd_dbgapi_debug_printf
> - ("wave_%ld disappeared, keeping it"
> + ("wave_%" PRIu64 " disappeared, keeping it"
> " (last_resume_mode=%s, stopping=%d)",
> wave_id.handle,
> resume_mode_to_string (wi.last_resume_mode),
> @@ -2162,8 +2162,8 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::update_thread_list ()
> }
> else
> {
> - amd_dbgapi_debug_printf ("wave_%ld disappeared, deleting it",
> - wave_id.handle);
> + amd_dbgapi_debug_printf ("wave_%" PRIu64 " disappeared, "
> + "deleting it", wave_id.handle);
> delete_thread_silent (&tp);
> }
> }
> @@ -2283,8 +2283,8 @@ amd_dbgapi_target::displaced_step_finish (thread_info *thread,
> sizeof (stop_reason), &stop_reason);
>
> if (status != AMD_DBGAPI_STATUS_SUCCESS)
> - error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%ld failed (%s)"), wave_id.handle,
> - get_status_string (status));
> + error (_("wave_get_info for wave_%" PRIu64 " failed (%s)"),
> + wave_id.handle, get_status_string (status));
>
> status = amd_dbgapi_displaced_stepping_complete (wave_id, stepping_id);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 14:28 Tankut Baris Aktemur
2026-07-01 15:16 ` Lancelot SIX [this message]
2026-07-01 16:56 ` Aktemur, Baris
2026-07-02 20:15 ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-03 12:59 ` Simon Marchi
2026-07-03 13:47 ` Pedro Alves
2026-07-03 18:15 ` Tom Tromey
2026-07-03 19:18 ` Pedro Alves
2026-07-03 19:22 ` Pedro Alves
2026-07-03 11:03 ` [PATCH v2] gdb, amd-dbgapi-target: use pulongest to print id handles Tankut Baris Aktemur
2026-07-03 11:22 ` Lancelot SIX
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6ae6dd2b-9577-4711-a0c8-93663a28e997@amd.com \
--to=lancelot.six@amd.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tankutbaris.aktemur@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox