Re: [PATCH] gdb, amd-dbgapi-target: use PRIu64 and PRIu32

[Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>]

On 7/2/26 4:15 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> Lancelot SIX <Lancelot.Six@amd.com> writes:
> 
>> Hi,
>> Doesn't GDB have an implicit habit/policy not to use the PRI??? macros?
> 
>> I do not mind them in amd-dbgapi-target.c, but want to make sure
>> global maintainers are fine with this.
> 
>> I guess the alternative is to use pulongest + %s instead of PRIu64.
> 
>> i.e. something like this:
> 
>>     str += (agent_id != AMD_DBGAPI_AGENT_NONE
>>         ? string_printf (" %s", pulongest (agent_id.handle))
>>         : "?");
> 
> I don't know if it's a policy exactly, but personally I prefer pulongest
> et al, since I find the PRI* macros pretty ugly and unreadable.
> 
> Tom

On my side I have no problem with the PRI macros, I like to use the
standard things where possible.

Alternatively, we could start using fmt :)

Simon