From: Pedro Alves <pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>
Cc: gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:54:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8f2776cb0801231311o19c31781h8a4663c405bcd22b@mail.gmail.com>
Jim Blandy wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2008 11:28 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> It was for Thumb in the first place.
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2001-03/msg00182.html
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2001-04/msg00012.html
>>
>> That may not be true on new toolchains though.
>
> Rats. If it'd be quick for you to check current toolchains, could you?
>
Jim Blandy wrote:
> 2001-04-06 Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
>
> * buildsym.c (record_line): Turn off unused addr bits.
>
> Could we try simply removing this?
>
Removing this shows no regressions on arm-eabi or arm-linux-gnueabi.
I've also ran the testsuite on arm-linux-gnueabi arm/thumb
replacing the stripping in record_line by logging the pc being
stripped, and no odd address was ever printed.
Would a patch removing this be more acceptable then?
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-22 21:17 arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-22 23:26 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-23 19:22 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 19:29 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 21:12 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 4:54 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2008-01-24 7:35 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 6:30 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 13:39 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-24 14:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 16:53 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 17:01 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 22:19 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 0:11 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-25 4:13 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 9:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Carlos O'Donell
2008-01-25 21:24 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-01-25 22:14 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-26 13:57 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-02-04 10:16 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 13:41 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 14:51 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 15:20 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-01-24 17:18 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Mark Kettenis
2008-01-24 17:50 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-24 21:33 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt \
--to=pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox