From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080125025555.GH3979@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47992419.1070201@codesourcery.com>
Thanks Pedro.
> /* The low two bits of the PC on the PA contain the privilege level.
> Some genius implementing a (non-GCC) compiler apparently decided
> this means that "addresses" in a text section therefore include a
> privilege level, and thus symbol tables should contain these bits.
> This seems like a bonehead thing to do--anyway, it seems to work
> for our purposes to just ignore those bits. */
I just love the comment :). I'm so happy I'm not the HP genius
in question :-). Seriously, I think we should be careful not to
add more sarcastic comments like this in the future, it's not
very serious nor very useful. That being said, I love sarcasm,
so I had a good laugh.
> I guess that compiler would be HP's. If the symbols had the bits set,
> so could the line info.
Right. That's why I mentioned the fact that part of my toolchain
was from GNU tools.
> Do we still support HP's object format and debug info ?
Not sure.
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-25 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-22 21:17 arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-22 23:26 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-23 19:22 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 19:29 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 21:12 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 4:54 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 7:35 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 6:30 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 13:39 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-24 14:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 16:53 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 17:01 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 22:19 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 0:11 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-25 4:13 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2008-01-25 9:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Carlos O'Donell
2008-01-25 21:24 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-01-25 22:14 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-26 13:57 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-02-04 10:16 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 13:41 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 14:51 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 15:20 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-01-24 17:18 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Mark Kettenis
2008-01-24 17:50 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-24 21:33 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080125025555.GH3979@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox