From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>,
Jim Blandy <jimb@red-bean.com>,
gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:41:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080204134132.GB28485@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0802041006230.23236@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:15:57AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> For the record -- to ever hit this case on MIPS you would have to run the
> test suite in the 32-bit kernel mode, so IRIX certainly does not apply
> here. One of the embedded targets might fit, e.g. using newlib and the
> GNU sim. Still this would be a bug if it mattered these days as proper
> sign-extension of addresses is meant to be done for MIPS now.
Really? This is for removing low bits, not high bits - I'd be more
worried about MIPS16.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-04 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-22 21:17 arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-22 23:26 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-23 19:22 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-23 19:29 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-23 21:12 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 4:54 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 7:35 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 6:30 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 13:39 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-01-24 14:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 16:53 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-24 17:01 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-24 22:19 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 0:11 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Pedro Alves
2008-01-25 4:13 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-25 9:56 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Carlos O'Donell
2008-01-25 21:24 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-01-25 22:14 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
2008-01-26 13:57 ` arm_addr_bits_remove John David Anglin
2008-02-04 10:16 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 13:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2008-02-04 14:45 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-02-04 14:51 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-02-04 15:20 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Maciej W. Rozycki
2008-01-24 17:18 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Mark Kettenis
2008-01-24 17:50 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Joel Brobecker
2008-01-24 21:33 ` arm_addr_bits_remove Jim Blandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080204134132.GB28485@caradoc.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jimb@red-bean.com \
--cc=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox