From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11435 invoked by alias); 4 Feb 2008 13:41:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 11425 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Feb 2008 13:41:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from NaN.false.org (HELO nan.false.org) (208.75.86.248) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:41:34 +0000 Received: from nan.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF419829D; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (22.svnf5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.183.55]) by nan.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8F098216; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JM1Zk-0007Pr-5a; Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:41:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , Jim Blandy , gdb-patches Subject: Re: arm_addr_bits_remove Message-ID: <20080204134132.GB28485@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves , Jim Blandy , gdb-patches References: <479752C8.8030201@portugalmail.pt> <8f2776cb0801231121r3fe9aea0q6f3c3d6887fcb251@mail.gmail.com> <20080123192842.GA22477@caradoc.them.org> <8f2776cb0801231311o19c31781h8a4663c405bcd22b@mail.gmail.com> <479819E2.1030603@portugalmail.pt> <8f2776cb0801232227n64502d4akef4642b051e77772@mail.gmail.com> <4798871B.4080207@codesourcery.com> <20080124133844.GA15771@caradoc.them.org> <20080124214849.GF3979@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:15:57AM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > For the record -- to ever hit this case on MIPS you would have to run the > test suite in the 32-bit kernel mode, so IRIX certainly does not apply > here. One of the embedded targets might fit, e.g. using newlib and the > GNU sim. Still this would be a bug if it mattered these days as proper > sign-extension of addresses is meant to be done for MIPS now. Really? This is for removing low bits, not high bits - I'd be more worried about MIPS16. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery