From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>,
Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Powerpc and software single step
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 02:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F42DD3C.9020508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030819191300.GA24336@nevyn.them.org>
> Could we do this slightly differently? SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P is used
> in two non-platform-specific files: infptrace.c for a sanity check, and
> infrun.c. In infrun, the only line which matters for this case is in
> resume:
> if (SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P () && step)
>
> Why not add a hook to check there which lets the user use software
> single step? It'll require playing with the target macros; we'd need
> something like:
> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP - perform software single step
> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P - SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP available
> SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_ONLY_P - no hardware singlestep available
> (check that in infptrace instead of SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP_P?)
>
> I've wanted to flip back and forth at runtime before.
See: Cleanup software single step.
http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=120
(but don't take the suggested solution literally).
I think kevin was playing with it (?) - search the mail archives. This
needs to be fixed - I don't think a workaround is acceptable.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-20 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 22:31 Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-19 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-08-19 19:05 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-19 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-19 22:32 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 2:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 2:57 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 3:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 3:21 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 13:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 13:54 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 15:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 16:02 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-21 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-22 13:17 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-22 15:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-22 17:32 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-22 18:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-08 18:58 ` Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: " Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-08 19:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 20:17 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-08 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 21:22 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-08 22:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 10:30 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 15:30 ` AHAH! " Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 16:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 17:01 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 22:01 ` PATCH: Re: AHAH! Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-10 1:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-10 2:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 2:30 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2003-08-20 2:33 ` Powerpc and software single step Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-21 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F42DD3C.9020508@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimix@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox