From: Jimi Xenidis <jimix@watson.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: Powerpc and software single step
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 20:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16220.58287.637563.556990@kitch0.watson.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030908190016.GB24747@nevyn.them.org>
>>>>> "DJ" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
DJ> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 02:58:30PM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
>> >>>>> "AC" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>>
AC> What about a patch to eliminate the macros? Good incremental step.
>>
>> Your wish is my (very much delayed) command ;-)
DJ> Eh, no. This patch would turn on software single-step for GNU/Linux
This patch simply removes the macro definitions. It does _not_ turn
on software single step for GNU/Linux since the macro tests for the
gdbarch vector which is NULL because it is undefined, but it is
defined for AIX.
I have verified this by both watching it with gdb and with strace
output.
DJ> also I doubt that's what you wanted to do.
You are right in that it is not what I wanted when this whole thing
started, but it was suggested that I remove the macro before I propose
the ability to select SW over HW at runtime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-08 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 22:31 Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-19 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-08-19 19:05 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-19 19:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-19 22:32 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 2:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 2:57 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 3:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 3:21 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 13:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-20 13:54 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-20 15:51 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 16:02 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-21 3:48 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-22 13:17 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-22 15:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-22 17:32 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-08-22 18:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-09-08 18:58 ` Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP from ppc Was: " Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-08 19:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 20:17 ` Jimi Xenidis [this message]
2003-09-08 20:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-09-08 21:22 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-08 22:01 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 10:30 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 15:30 ` AHAH! " Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 16:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 17:01 ` Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-09 17:55 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-09-09 22:01 ` PATCH: Re: AHAH! Re: Patch to eliminate SOFTWARE_SINGLE_STEP Jimi Xenidis
2003-09-10 1:24 ` Kevin Buettner
2003-10-10 2:40 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 2:30 ` Powerpc and software single step Andrew Cagney
2003-08-20 2:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-08-21 14:01 ` Andrew Cagney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16220.58287.637563.556990@kitch0.watson.ibm.com \
--to=jimix@watson.ibm.com \
--cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox