From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB882DD.8050009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DB86874.50FB3D1E@redhat.com>
> At least this does move things forward - it puts the tesuite in a state
>> > where everyone and everyone can incrementally do the marking.
>
>>
>> But nobody will...
>
>
> Removing the XFAILS without replacing them with KFAILS is not fixing a bug.
Why?
While not immediatly installing KFAILs does increase the number of
FAILs, GDB's failure rate has, for the last >2 years been artifically
deflated to the tune of ~200! All I'm doing is removing that artifical
adjustment, putting things back to where they should have been >2 years ago.
Those XFAILs should have been pulled years ago but were not. Instead,
as a political compromise, the move/debate was delayed until after
Fernando invested their own time in getting KFAIL added. Are we now
going to delay things by another N years while we all sit around and
wait for someone to magically volenteer to do, in a single hit, all that
audit work?
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-24 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-24 11:41 Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 12:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:39 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-10-24 16:36 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:58 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:31 ` Ben Elliston
2002-10-24 16:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 17:35 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:18 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:39 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 14:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 15:00 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:26 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 15:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 15:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 17:25 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 16:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 17:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 19:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-15 17:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-15 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:27 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:46 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 15:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 14:20 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 17:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:12 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 14:12 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 14:26 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 19:00 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:16 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:20 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:32 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB882DD.8050009@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox