Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:29:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB84A34.6070801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021024190956.GA20879@nevyn.them.org>

> On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 02:41:05PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> GDB's testsuite is known to be full of xfails that are really kfails or 
>> testsuite bugs.  Rather than try to audit each xfail in turn, the 
>> proposal as been to rip out all the xfails (creating a clean slate) and 
>> start marking up the tests from scratch - two steps forward but first 
>> one step back.
>> 
>> I figure I might as well try to get the ball rolling on this and find 
>> out just how much real resistance there is going to be to a change like 
>> this.  To that end, this removes all xfail's from the gdb.mi testsuite. 
>>  Similar tests, for the other directories, would follow.
> 
> 
> I'm known to be a testsuite nazi - I really, really dislike the current
> failure levels, and people aren't doing much about it.  I'm all in
> favor of getting the ball rolling.  But are you planning to do the
> marking promptly, or just make us stare at even more MI failures for a
> while?  I've been staring at the mi-console one for a year...

I believe that you're free to start kfailing things :-)

As for me doing the kfail's, the chances of me getting back to that 
short term are, lets say, pretty remote.  I'm just trying to get the 
process started - eliminate the task that's going to cop the most flack :-)

> I know it's not practical to do them completely without getting the
> testsuite run on a lot of systems, by a lot of people.  But you can do
> a fair first-order approximation without that.

Andrew



  reply	other threads:[~2002-10-24 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-24 11:41 Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 12:29   ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-10-24 12:58     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:22       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:26         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:39           ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 16:31             ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 16:36               ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:50           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:58             ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:31               ` Ben Elliston
2002-10-24 16:44               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 17:35                 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 18:25                   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:18 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:32   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:39 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 14:57   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 15:00     ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:26     ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 15:36       ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 15:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 17:25   ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 16:53     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 17:05       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 19:03         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 19:55           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-15 17:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-15 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:27   ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:30     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:46       ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:52         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 15:46     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 14:20 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 17:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:12 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 14:12   ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 16:05     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 14:26 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 19:00 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:16 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:20   ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:30     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:32 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3DB84A34.6070801@redhat.com \
    --to=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox