From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 14:30:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030116143053.GA22382@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E26C140.8050400@redhat.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:27:12AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >>
> >>>From the gdb user's point of view, a bug is a bug. A gdb user can do
> >>the same thing as the test suite and then file a PR: 'gdb fails to
> >>print 'const' for const types'.
> >
> >
> >I'm not sure I agree with this. My point of view was that either it's
> >an expected bug (environment) or it is a "known bug in the tool being
> >tested". I don't like calling environment bugs KFAILs. Do that, and
> >we'll just end up with no XFAILs...
> >
> >Associating a PR with them is a different issue. Just because we
> >associate a PR doesn't mean we have to use KFAIL.
> >
>
> That is correct. The last argument of a setup_xfail, if it does not
> contain '-' (Argh! Don't blame me, it was already there since immemorial
> times) is the PR number. It can easily be a gdb/NNN bug id. We cannot
> enforce the syntax, but we can enforce it as a police.
[Last or first? Oh, the answer is "either" according to framework.exp.]
> So, to address Michael's concerns, we could open a WONTFIX bug report (is
> there such category? This is the Bugzilla one) saying that it is a GCC or
> whatever bug and outside of our control and add the id to the setup_xfail.
We could use the Suspended state for this, and we could just assign
them to a new environment/ category...
> Why doing this? A script can go through the KFAILs (for each platform)
> and, by reading the Gnats database, automatically create a KNOWN BUGS man
> page section, or a section of a Release Notes document. Using the same
> principle, it can go through the XFAILs and generate a section of known
> limitations _on a specific environment_ (the one where the test results
> were obtained).
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
> P.S.: Does someone know how to programatically access the Gnats database?
Yes; the GNATS software package includes a number of remote tools,
particularly nquery-pr. You have to find a copy of GNATS 3.x; the 4.x
tools don't interoperate with the version on sourceware.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-16 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-15 17:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-15 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:27 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-01-16 14:46 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 15:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 14:20 ` Fernando Nasser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-17 19:32 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:00 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:16 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:20 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 20:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 14:12 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 14:26 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 17:12 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-10-24 11:41 Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 12:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:39 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 16:36 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:58 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:31 ` Ben Elliston
2002-10-24 16:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 17:35 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:18 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:39 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 14:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 15:00 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:26 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 15:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 15:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 17:25 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 16:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 17:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 19:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030116143053.GA22382@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox