Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:20:30AM -0800, David Carlton wrote:
> On 17 Jan 2003 11:16:48 -0800, David Carlton <carlton@math.Stanford.EDU> said:
> 
> > I'm gradually going through the current non-{PASS,KFAIL} results
> > that I see on my test runs in gdb.c++, and investigating them; I'm
> > not distinguishing between XFAIL and FAIL (and XPASS, for that
> > matter) when doing so.  Once I'm done with that, I'll move on to the
> > xfail's that I don't see; I've noticed that there are an awful lot
> > of DWARF 1 ones, which I assume actually are legit.
> 
> Also, one thing I've noticed is that the string "FIXME" occurs a fair
> number of times in gdb.c++, with a similar meaning to XFAIL (and
> typically used in combination with XFAIL).  That's another thing that
> has to be audited.

Yes.  In particular, all the vtable related ones should be fixed.  I
just haven't figured out what the right output should look like, yet...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer