From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] Remove all setup_xfail's from testsuite/gdb.mi/
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB86CB6.10801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1y98nzfca.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2002 14:41:05 -0400, Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> said:
>
>
>> GDB's testsuite is known to be full of xfails that are really kfails
>> or testsuite bugs. Rather than try to audit each xfail in turn, the
>> proposal as been to rip out all the xfails (creating a clean slate)
>> and start marking up the tests from scratch - two steps forward but
>> first one step back.
>
>
> Can you give me a little guidance here? Elena recently made the
> suggestion that I should add tests to the testsuite for namespace
> stuff, even before I've modified GDB to handle that. That sounded
> sensible to me, so I added that to a branch, and marked them all as
> xfail.
I think Elena mentioned KFAIL. Any way, that is want you want to use -
you'll need to bug report any failures though.
> I suspect I was wrong about that, though I'm not sure about the
> subtleties of what xfail is actually supposed to mean. I was thinking
> I should go and change them to kfail, but now I'm not confident that I
> know the intended semantics of that, either. Is kfail only allowed
> for tests with a PR associated to them? Admittedly, in a branch,
> xfail and kfail mean whatever I want them to mean, I suppose, and I'm
> not going to try to get those tests added to the mainline unless I can
> bring along much of the code that cause them to pass instead of fail.
A fairly good definition is:
KFAIL == bug, in GDB, something to fix.
XFAIL == bug, not in GDB (kernel, debug info, linker, ...), something to
ignore.
> I guess I don't see the point in removing xfails from the testsuite:
> it's useful information, it doesn't make regression testing any harder
> (there, the main culprit is the !@#%# schedlock test), so why throw
> that away? If xfail has the wrong meaning, then change it to kfail;
> if kfail also has the wrong meaning, then change the meaning of kfail.
People have been XFAILing bugs in GDB. That is simply wrong.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-24 21:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-24 11:41 Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:09 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 12:29 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 12:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:26 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-10-24 14:39 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 16:31 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 16:36 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:50 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:58 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:31 ` Ben Elliston
2002-10-24 16:44 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 17:35 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 18:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:18 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 14:32 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-10-24 14:39 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 14:57 ` Andrew Cagney [this message]
2002-10-24 15:00 ` Michael Snyder
2002-10-24 15:26 ` David Carlton
2002-10-24 15:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 15:55 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-15 17:25 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 16:53 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 17:05 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 19:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 19:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-15 17:44 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-15 17:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:27 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 14:46 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 14:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-16 15:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-16 14:20 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-16 17:07 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 17:12 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:06 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-16 20:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 14:12 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 16:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 14:26 ` Fernando Nasser
2003-01-17 19:00 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:16 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:20 ` David Carlton
2003-01-17 19:30 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:28 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-17 19:28 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-01-17 19:34 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-01-17 19:32 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB86CB6.10801@redhat.com \
--to=ac131313@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox