From: Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
To: Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: "George, Jini Susan" <JiniSusan.George@amd.com>,
"Parasuraman, Hariharan" <Hariharan.Parasuraman@amd.com>,
"Sharma, Alok Kumar" <AlokKumar.Sharma@amd.com>,
"Potharla, Rupesh" <Rupesh.Potharla@amd.com>
Subject: Re: GDB/Fortran: Support for Assumed Rank Zero.
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 10:30:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220419103027.298d8ea5@f35-zws-1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418083328.5fb70540@f35-zws-1>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 08:33:28 -0700
Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> wrote:
> I'm also (still) wondering how to run the testsuite to use flang
> instead of gfortran since it'd be nice to test to see if the setup_xfail
> actually works. I spent just enough time looking at it last week
> to convince myself that GDB's testing infrastructure currently lacks the
> mechanisms to do this. However, I could be wrong, so if someone
> knows how it's done, I'd like to learn about it...
It seems that the answer is to run the test as follows:
make check TESTS="gdb.fortran/assumedrank.exp" RUNTESTFLAGS="F90_FOR_TARGET=flang"
(I thought that I had tried this last week.)
When I run the above command on my Fedora 35 machine, I see:
# of expected passes 500
# of unexpected failures 2503
# of unresolved testcases 500
So it seems that this test doesn't work very well with flang at the
moment.
That being the case, while I'm not against adding setup_xfail for
clang, it doesn't seem all that useful due to the dismal results
when testing against flang.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-19 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 9:55 Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-13 18:27 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-04-14 10:30 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-14 21:28 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-04-15 13:33 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-15 19:31 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-04-16 18:29 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-18 13:31 ` Tom Tromey
2022-04-18 15:25 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 15:22 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 19:08 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-22 14:38 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2022-04-25 6:33 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-25 8:47 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2022-04-18 15:33 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-04-19 17:30 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches [this message]
2022-04-20 0:29 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 6:32 ` Kempke, Nils-Christian via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 15:38 ` Kevin Buettner via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 15:29 ` Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches
2022-04-20 19:20 ` Potharla, Rupesh via Gdb-patches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220419103027.298d8ea5@f35-zws-1 \
--to=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=AlokKumar.Sharma@amd.com \
--cc=Hariharan.Parasuraman@amd.com \
--cc=JiniSusan.George@amd.com \
--cc=Rupesh.Potharla@amd.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox