From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: "Agovic, Sanimir" <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>,
"gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411202747.GN4250@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53483E24.5060302@redhat.com>
> >Thank you Joel for helping me out through the patch series! I just
> >committed the patches including the final adjustments.
>
> Unfortunatley, this patchset has regressed the following tests:
Argh! Sorry about that, and thanks for the heads up, Keith.
I'm doing a quick round of testing with what's left of my day today,
but we might have to revert the patch series to allow us more time
to investigate.
How come this didn't show up in Sanimir's testing?
>
> > FAIL: gdb.base/pointers.exp: print array element w/ pointer arithmetic
> > FAIL: gdb.cp/koenig.exp: p foo(jca)
> > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.exp: 3x2, one byte offset by -6
> > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.exp: expression in quotes
> > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.exp: ascii and data
> > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.exp: decimal
> > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.exp: octal
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_streq (str1, str2)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_streq (str1, str3)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_strlen (str1)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_strlen (buf1)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "Hello")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "Help")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "^Hello")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "^Hello.$")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_streq (str1, str2)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_streq (str1, str3)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_strlen (str1)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_strlen (buf1)
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "Hello")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "Help")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "^Hello")
> > FAIL: gdb.python/py-strfns.exp: p $_regex (str1, "^Hello.$")
>
> With --target_board=native-gdbsever, remote.exp has two additional
> failures. This is using x86_64 Fedora 20 (gcc Red Hat 4.8.2-7).
>
> Keith
--
Joel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 12:42 Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] refactoring: rename create_range_type to create_static_range_type Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:43 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] vla: introduce new bound type abstraction adapt uses Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] type: add c99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:46 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] vla: update type from newly created value Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] vla: support for DW_AT_count Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:50 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] test: multi-dimensional c99 vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] test: add mi vla test Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:39 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 14:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-22 15:33 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-22 16:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-11 12:50 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-11 20:03 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 20:27 ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-04-11 20:33 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 21:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-11 21:19 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 22:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 8:34 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [vla v7 pushed] " Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/12] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/12] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/12] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] type: add c99 variable length array support Joel Brobecker
2014-04-18 19:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/12] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/12] vla: update type from newly created value Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/12] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/12] vla: support for DW_AT_count Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/12] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/12] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 09/12] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/12] test: add mi vla test Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:36 ` [vla v7 pushed] Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Agovic, Sanimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411202747.GN4250@adacore.com \
--to=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=keiths@redhat.com \
--cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox