Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
To: Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 14:31:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140410143131.GC15965@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397133617-26681-11-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com>

> 2014-02-05  Sanimir Agovic  <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
>             Keven Boell <keven.boell@intel.com>
> 
> 	* eval.c (evaluate_subexp_for_sizeof): Add enum noside argument.
> 	(evaluate_subexp_standard): Pass noside argument.
> 	(evaluate_subexp_for_sizeof) <BINOP_SUBSCRIPT>: Handle subscript case
> 	if noside equals EVAL_NORMAL. If the subscript yields a vla type
> 	re-evaluate subscript operation with EVAL_NORMAL to enable sideffects.
> 	* gdbtypes.c (resolve_dynamic_bounds): Mark bound as evaluated.
> 	* gdbtypes.h (enum range_flags): Add RANGE_EVALUATED case.
> 
> testsuite/gdb.base/
> 
> 	* vla-sideeffect.c: New file.
> 	* vla-sideeffect.exp: New file.

Approved with some minor trivial modifications.

>  /* Evaluate a subexpression of EXP, at index *POS,
>     and return a value for the size of that subexpression.
> -   Advance *POS over the subexpression.  */
> +   Advance *POS over the subexpression. If NOSIDE is EVAL_NORMAL
                                       ^^^^^^^
Minor style nit: Two spaces after a period ("If NOSIDE")

> +		  if (TYPE_RANGE_DATA (type)->flag_bound_evaluated)
> +		    {
> +		      val = evaluate_subexp (NULL_TYPE, exp, pos, EVAL_NORMAL);
> +		      return value_from_longest
> +			(size_type, (LONGEST)TYPE_LENGTH (value_type (val)));

I missed this one in the my first review, but there should be a space
after "(LONGEST)".

> +set sizeof_vla [ expr "10" * "$sizeof_int" ]
> +
> +gdb_test "print sizeof (vla1\[i++\])" "= ${sizeof_int}" \

Just to be consistent, let's add a space before the "=" sign.

> +         "print sizeof (vla1\[i++\])"

Thanks,
-- 
Joel


  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-10 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-10 12:42 [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] refactoring: rename create_range_type to create_static_range_type Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:43 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] vla: introduce new bound type abstraction adapt uses Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] type: add c99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:21   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:46 ` [PATCH v6 06/15] vla: update type from newly created value Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] vla: support for DW_AT_count Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:22   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:31   ` Joel Brobecker [this message]
2014-04-10 12:50 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] test: multi-dimensional c99 vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] test: add mi vla test Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:39 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 14:46   ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-22 15:33     ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-22 16:58       ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-11 12:50   ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-11 20:03     ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 20:27       ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-11 20:33         ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 21:13           ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-11 21:19             ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 22:33             ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14  8:34               ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-14 17:13                 ` [vla v7 pushed] " Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 06/12] vla: support for DW_AT_count Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 08/12] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 04/12] vla: update type from newly created value Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 07/12] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 02/12] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 01/12] type: add c99 variable length array support Joel Brobecker
2014-04-18 19:06                     ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 03/12] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13                   ` [PATCH 05/12] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14                   ` [PATCH 12/12] test: add mi vla test Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14                   ` [PATCH 09/12] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14                   ` [PATCH 10/12] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14                   ` [PATCH 11/12] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:36                   ` [vla v7 pushed] Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Agovic, Sanimir

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140410143131.GC15965@adacore.com \
    --to=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox