From: Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, tromey@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 06/15] vla: update type from newly created value
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 12:46:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397133617-26681-7-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397133617-26681-1-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
Constructing a value based on a type and address might change the type
of the newly constructed value. Thus re-fetch type via value_type to ensure
we have the correct type at hand.
2013-10-18 Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
Keven Boell <keven.boell@intel.com>
* ada-lang.c (ada_value_primitive_packed_val): Re-fetch type from value.
(ada_template_to_fixed_record_type_1): Likewise.
(ada_to_fixed_type_1): Likewise.
* cp-valprint.c (cp_print_value_fields_rtti): Likewise.
(cp_print_value): Likewise.
* d-valprint.c (dynamic_array_type): Likewise.
* eval.c (evaluate_subexp_with_coercion): Likewise.
* findvar.c (address_of_variable): Likewise.
* jv-valprint.c (java_value_print): Likewise.
* valops.c (value_ind): Likewise.
* value.c (coerce_ref): Likewise.
Signed-off-by: Sanimir Agovic <sanimir.agovic@intel.com>
---
gdb/ada-lang.c | 13 +++++++++++--
gdb/cp-valprint.c | 2 ++
gdb/d-valprint.c | 1 +
gdb/eval.c | 1 +
gdb/jv-valprint.c | 1 +
gdb/valops.c | 4 ++++
gdb/value.c | 1 +
7 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ada-lang.c b/gdb/ada-lang.c
index d08e116..caf52f2 100644
--- a/gdb/ada-lang.c
+++ b/gdb/ada-lang.c
@@ -2300,6 +2300,7 @@ ada_value_primitive_packed_val (struct value *obj, const gdb_byte *valaddr,
else if (VALUE_LVAL (obj) == lval_memory && value_lazy (obj))
{
v = value_at (type, value_address (obj));
+ type = value_type (v);
bytes = (unsigned char *) alloca (len);
read_memory (value_address (v) + offset, bytes, len);
}
@@ -7658,6 +7659,7 @@ ada_template_to_fixed_record_type_1 (struct type *type,
size first before creating the value. */
check_size (rtype);
dval = value_from_contents_and_address (rtype, valaddr, address);
+ rtype = value_type (dval);
}
else
dval = dval0;
@@ -7760,7 +7762,10 @@ ada_template_to_fixed_record_type_1 (struct type *type,
off = TYPE_FIELD_BITPOS (rtype, variant_field);
if (dval0 == NULL)
- dval = value_from_contents_and_address (rtype, valaddr, address);
+ {
+ dval = value_from_contents_and_address (rtype, valaddr, address);
+ rtype = value_type (dval);
+ }
else
dval = dval0;
@@ -7901,7 +7906,10 @@ to_record_with_fixed_variant_part (struct type *type, const gdb_byte *valaddr,
return type;
if (dval0 == NULL)
- dval = value_from_contents_and_address (type, valaddr, address);
+ {
+ dval = value_from_contents_and_address (type, valaddr, address);
+ type = value_type (dval);
+ }
else
dval = dval0;
@@ -8199,6 +8207,7 @@ ada_to_fixed_type_1 (struct type *type, const gdb_byte *valaddr,
value_from_contents_and_address (fixed_record_type,
valaddr,
address);
+ fixed_record_type = value_type (obj);
if (real_type != NULL)
return to_fixed_record_type
(real_type, NULL,
diff --git a/gdb/cp-valprint.c b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
index bcf54ff..b868d37 100644
--- a/gdb/cp-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/cp-valprint.c
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ cp_print_value_fields_rtti (struct type *type,
/* Ugh, we have to convert back to a value here. */
value = value_from_contents_and_address (type, valaddr + offset,
address + offset);
+ type = value_type (value);
/* We don't actually care about most of the result here -- just
the type. We already have the correct offset, due to how
val_print was initially called. */
@@ -545,6 +546,7 @@ cp_print_value (struct type *type, struct type *real_type,
base_val = value_from_contents_and_address (baseclass,
buf,
address + boffset);
+ baseclass = value_type (base_val);
thisoffset = 0;
boffset = 0;
thistype = baseclass;
diff --git a/gdb/d-valprint.c b/gdb/d-valprint.c
index 6e9c28d..cca629a 100644
--- a/gdb/d-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/d-valprint.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ dynamic_array_type (struct type *type, const gdb_byte *valaddr,
true_type = lookup_array_range_type (true_type, 0, length - 1);
ival = value_at (true_type, addr);
+ true_type = value_type (ival);
d_val_print (true_type,
value_contents_for_printing (ival),
diff --git a/gdb/eval.c b/gdb/eval.c
index b3e45ca..85cf071 100644
--- a/gdb/eval.c
+++ b/gdb/eval.c
@@ -2985,6 +2985,7 @@ evaluate_subexp_with_coercion (struct expression *exp,
{
(*pos) += 4;
val = address_of_variable (var, exp->elts[pc + 1].block);
+ type = value_type (val);
return value_cast (lookup_pointer_type (TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (type)),
val);
}
diff --git a/gdb/jv-valprint.c b/gdb/jv-valprint.c
index f465ca0..808e01b 100644
--- a/gdb/jv-valprint.c
+++ b/gdb/jv-valprint.c
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ java_value_print (struct value *val, struct ui_file *stream,
type = lookup_pointer_type (type);
val = value_at (type, address);
+ type = value_type (val);
}
}
diff --git a/gdb/valops.c b/gdb/valops.c
index eefa8c6..4b81a7a 100644
--- a/gdb/valops.c
+++ b/gdb/valops.c
@@ -268,6 +268,7 @@ value_cast_structs (struct type *type, struct value *v2)
{
v = value_full_object (v2, real_type, full, top, using_enc);
v = value_at_lazy (real_type, value_address (v));
+ real_type = value_type (v);
/* We might be trying to cast to the outermost enclosing
type, in which case search_struct_field won't work. */
@@ -803,6 +804,7 @@ value_dynamic_cast (struct type *type, struct value *arg)
return value_at_lazy (type, addr);
tem = value_at (type, addr);
+ type = value_type (tem);
/* The first dynamic check specified in 5.2.7. */
if (is_public_ancestor (arg_type, TYPE_TARGET_TYPE (resolved_type)))
@@ -1372,6 +1374,7 @@ address_of_variable (struct symbol *var, const struct block *b)
Lazy evaluation pays off here. */
val = value_of_variable (var, b);
+ type = value_type (val);
if ((VALUE_LVAL (val) == lval_memory && value_lazy (val))
|| TYPE_CODE (type) == TYPE_CODE_FUNC)
@@ -1620,6 +1623,7 @@ value_ind (struct value *arg1)
(value_as_address (arg1)
- value_pointed_to_offset (arg1)));
+ enc_type = value_type (arg2);
return readjust_indirect_value_type (arg2, enc_type, base_type, arg1);
}
diff --git a/gdb/value.c b/gdb/value.c
index 993157f..3139a8b 100644
--- a/gdb/value.c
+++ b/gdb/value.c
@@ -3364,6 +3364,7 @@ coerce_ref (struct value *arg)
retval = value_at_lazy (enc_type,
unpack_pointer (value_type (arg),
value_contents (arg)));
+ enc_type = value_type (retval);
return readjust_indirect_value_type (retval, enc_type,
value_type_arg_tmp, arg);
}
--
1.8.4.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 12:42 [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:42 ` [PATCH v6 01/15] refactoring: rename create_range_type to create_static_range_type Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:43 ` [PATCH v6 02/15] vla: introduce new bound type abstraction adapt uses Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 04/15] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v6 03/15] type: add c99 variable length array support Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:21 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v6 05/15] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:46 ` Sanimir Agovic [this message]
2014-04-10 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/15] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 09/15] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:22 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 08/15] vla: support for DW_AT_count Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 11/15] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:49 ` [PATCH v6 10/15] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 12:50 ` [PATCH v6 12/15] test: multi-dimensional c99 vla Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/15] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:52 ` [PATCH v6 14/15] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 12:53 ` [PATCH v6 15/15] test: add mi vla test Sanimir Agovic
2014-04-10 14:39 ` [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Joel Brobecker
2014-04-10 14:46 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-22 15:33 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-22 16:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-04-11 12:50 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-11 20:03 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 20:27 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-11 20:33 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 21:13 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-11 21:19 ` Keith Seitz
2014-04-11 22:33 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 8:34 ` Agovic, Sanimir
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [vla v7 pushed] " Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 08/12] vla: evaluate operand of sizeof if its type is a vla Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 02/12] vla: enable sizeof operator to work with variable length arrays Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 01/12] type: add c99 variable length array support Joel Brobecker
2014-04-18 19:06 ` Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 07/12] vla: resolve dynamic bounds if value contents is a constant byte-sequence Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 04/12] vla: update type from newly created value Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 06/12] vla: support for DW_AT_count Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 03/12] vla: enable sizeof operator for indirection Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:13 ` [PATCH 05/12] vla: print "variable length" for unresolved dynamic bounds Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 12/12] test: add mi vla test Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 11/12] test: basic c99 vla tests for C primitives Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 10/12] test: evaluate pointers to C99 vla correctly Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:14 ` [PATCH 09/12] test: cover subranges with present DW_AT_count attribute Joel Brobecker
2014-04-14 17:36 ` [vla v7 pushed] Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] Please have a final look Agovic, Sanimir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397133617-26681-7-git-send-email-sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
--to=sanimir.agovic@intel.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox