* [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
@ 2011-07-22 15:42 Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 17:38 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2011-07-22 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
I did yet a bit more work on:
<http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
mechanism.
IMO, this is committable as is. WDYT?
There's a lot left to do still. E.g.: The print_one method
is still left behind; insert/removal could do with better
abstracting; a lot of tangling revealed by the need for
special checks of tracepoint/watchpoint types at inner layers
of breakpoint creation; there are many places that still
switch on the breakpoint's type, as there's no breakpoint_ops
equivalent for what they're doing.
No regressions for me, native or gdbserver x86_64-linux.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-22 15:42 [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints Pedro Alves
@ 2011-07-22 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-25 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 17:38 ` Phil Muldoon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-07-22 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
Pedro> I did yet a bit more work on:
Pedro> <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
Pedro> This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
Pedro> mechanism.
Pedro> IMO, this is committable as is. WDYT?
I read through them all. I think this is a great series. Please check
it in.
I'm not particularly fond of patch #4, but I understand why you did it,
and I agree that statically initialized vtables are a pain -- I am often
grepping for all instances and hoping I haven't missed one. (I wish we
could require designated initializers for these so I could more easily
search for field names...)
I think we could make most of the vtable pointers (but not objects due
to the initialization approach) const. I think that would help clarity
a bit. I'm happy to do this after these patches go in.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-22 15:42 [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2011-07-22 17:38 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-25 14:17 ` Pedro Alves
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Phil Muldoon @ 2011-07-22 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> I did yet a bit more work on:
>
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
>
> This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
> mechanism.
>
> IMO, this is committable as is. WDYT?
I think it is great. It clears up several (dozen) ambiguities with
breakpoint operations. I don't think this will affect the Python
breakpoint_ops work (other than some refactoring, but we'll come to that
bridge when your work is checked in).
Thanks for this patch.
Cheers,
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-22 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2011-07-25 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-25 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2011-07-25 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Tromey; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Friday 22 July 2011 18:22:37, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> Pedro> I did yet a bit more work on:
> Pedro> <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
> Pedro> This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
> Pedro> mechanism.
>
> Pedro> IMO, this is committable as is. WDYT?
>
> I read through them all. I think this is a great series. Please check
> it in.
Great, thanks. I've applied the series now.
> I think we could make most of the vtable pointers (but not objects due
> to the initialization approach) const. I think that would help clarity
> a bit. I'm happy to do this after these patches go in.
Yeah, please go ahead.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-22 17:38 ` Phil Muldoon
@ 2011-07-25 14:17 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-25 14:40 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Pedro Alves @ 2011-07-25 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pmuldoon; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Friday 22 July 2011 18:32:59, Phil Muldoon wrote:
> Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > I did yet a bit more work on:
> >
> > <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00374.html>
> >
> > This converts all breakpoint kinds to the breakpoint_ops
> > mechanism.
> >
> > IMO, this is committable as is. WDYT?
>
> I think it is great. It clears up several (dozen) ambiguities with
> breakpoint operations. I don't think this will affect the Python
> breakpoint_ops work (other than some refactoring, but we'll come to that
> bridge when your work is checked in).
Yeah, I don't think your current patch would need more than a
some trivial updates, but then again, I did leave the print_one
method behind in this conversion, which was the method that
I raised having the issue that doesn't seem to fit for gdb's own
breakpoints currently, so we should clean that up before
considering exposing it as public API.
--
Pedro Alves
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-25 14:17 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2011-07-25 14:40 ` Phil Muldoon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Phil Muldoon @ 2011-07-25 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
> On Friday 22 July 2011 18:32:59, Phil Muldoon wrote:
>> I think it is great. It clears up several (dozen) ambiguities with
>> breakpoint operations. I don't think this will affect the Python
>> breakpoint_ops work (other than some refactoring, but we'll come to that
>> bridge when your work is checked in).
>
> Yeah, I don't think your current patch would need more than a
> some trivial updates, but then again, I did leave the print_one
> method behind in this conversion, which was the method that
> I raised having the issue that doesn't seem to fit for gdb's own
> breakpoints currently, so we should clean that up before
> considering exposing it as public API.
I have been thinking on your comments quite a bit in the last few
weeks, and about external facing APIs in general. I don't think it is
sensible to make 1:1 mappings of these breakpoint_ops APIs
to Python. I think "print_one" "print_it" mean nothing to a Python
scripting user. I've come to the conclusion that we should abstract
these functions to concepts a Python scripter can better understand. So
"print_one" will not be directly exposed as before. The Python API,
will end up calling print_one, sure, but there will (I hope) be
sufficient levels of abstraction that any future refactoring will be
coped with internally. We already massage the data to-and-from GDB
extensively anyway, so it makes better sense to the user.
So my plan is to submit a patch after yours is checked in, with the new
APIs. We can look again, then, if it makes sense at that point, and if
any future refactorings of print_one will really matter to the user from
an API perspective.
Cheers,
Phil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints
2011-07-25 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
@ 2011-07-25 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2011-07-25 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pedro Alves; +Cc: gdb-patches
Tom> I think we could make most of the vtable pointers (but not objects due
Tom> to the initialization approach) const. I think that would help clarity
Tom> a bit. I'm happy to do this after these patches go in.
Pedro> Yeah, please go ahead.
Patch appended. Built and regtested by the buildbot.
I'm committing it.
Tom
2011-07-25 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* ada-lang.c (ada_exception_breakpoint_ops): Make return type
const.
(ada_exception_sal): Make 'ops' const.
(ada_decode_exception_location): Likewise.
(ada_decode_assert_location): Likewise.
(catch_assert_command): Update.
(catch_ada_exception_command): Update.
(create_ada_exception_catchpoint): Make 'ops' const.
* breakpoint.c (set_raw_breakpoint_without_location)
(set_raw_breakpoint, momentary_breakpoint_from_master): Make 'ops'
const.
(create_internal_breakpoint): Update.
(init_raw_breakpoint_without_location): Make 'ops' const.
(init_raw_breakpoint, init_catchpoint)
(create_fork_vfork_event_catchpoint)
(create_syscall_event_catchpoint, init_breakpoint_sal)
(create_breakpoint_sal, create_breakpoints_sal)
(create_breakpoint, init_ada_exception_breakpoint): Likewise.
* breakpoint.h (struct breakpoint) <ops>: Now const.
(init_ada_exception_breakpoint, create_breakpoint): Make 'ops'
const.
diff --git a/gdb/ada-lang.c b/gdb/ada-lang.c
index d017800..02115de 100644
--- a/gdb/ada-lang.c
+++ b/gdb/ada-lang.c
@@ -10863,7 +10863,7 @@ ada_exception_name_addr (enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex,
static struct symtab_and_line ada_exception_sal (enum exception_catchpoint_kind,
char *, char **,
- struct breakpoint_ops **);
+ const struct breakpoint_ops **);
static char *ada_exception_catchpoint_cond_string (const char *excep_string);
/* Ada catchpoints.
@@ -11538,7 +11538,7 @@ ada_exception_sym_name (enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex)
/* Return the breakpoint ops "virtual table" used for catchpoints
of the EX kind. */
-static struct breakpoint_ops *
+static const struct breakpoint_ops *
ada_exception_breakpoint_ops (enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex)
{
switch (ex)
@@ -11613,7 +11613,7 @@ ada_exception_catchpoint_cond_string (const char *excep_string)
static struct symtab_and_line
ada_exception_sal (enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex, char *excep_string,
- char **addr_string, struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
+ char **addr_string, const struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
{
const char *sym_name;
struct symbol *sym;
@@ -11676,7 +11676,7 @@ ada_exception_sal (enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex, char *excep_string,
static struct symtab_and_line
ada_decode_exception_location (char *args, char **addr_string,
char **excep_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
{
enum exception_catchpoint_kind ex;
@@ -11691,7 +11691,7 @@ create_ada_exception_catchpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal,
char *addr_string,
char *excep_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
int tempflag,
int from_tty)
{
@@ -11716,7 +11716,7 @@ catch_ada_exception_command (char *arg, int from_tty,
struct symtab_and_line sal;
char *addr_string = NULL;
char *excep_string = NULL;
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops = NULL;
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops = NULL;
tempflag = get_cmd_context (command) == CATCH_TEMPORARY;
@@ -11729,7 +11729,7 @@ catch_ada_exception_command (char *arg, int from_tty,
static struct symtab_and_line
ada_decode_assert_location (char *args, char **addr_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops **ops)
{
/* Check that no argument where provided at the end of the command. */
@@ -11754,7 +11754,7 @@ catch_assert_command (char *arg, int from_tty,
int tempflag;
struct symtab_and_line sal;
char *addr_string = NULL;
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops = NULL;
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops = NULL;
tempflag = get_cmd_context (command) == CATCH_TEMPORARY;
diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.c b/gdb/breakpoint.c
index 4f09d3a..5afda31 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.c
@@ -108,17 +108,18 @@ static void mention (struct breakpoint *);
static struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct gdbarch *,
enum bptype,
- struct breakpoint_ops *);
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *);
/* This function is used in gdbtk sources and thus can not be made
static. */
struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line,
- enum bptype, struct breakpoint_ops *);
+ enum bptype,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *);
static struct breakpoint *
momentary_breakpoint_from_master (struct breakpoint *orig,
enum bptype type,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops);
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops);
static void breakpoint_adjustment_warning (CORE_ADDR, CORE_ADDR, int, int);
@@ -2110,7 +2111,7 @@ set_breakpoint_number (int internal, struct breakpoint *b)
static struct breakpoint *
create_internal_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
CORE_ADDR address, enum bptype type,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct symtab_and_line sal;
struct breakpoint *b;
@@ -5605,7 +5606,7 @@ static void
init_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct breakpoint *b,
struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
enum bptype bptype,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
memset (b, 0, sizeof (*b));
@@ -5634,7 +5635,7 @@ init_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct breakpoint *b,
static struct breakpoint *
set_raw_breakpoint_without_location (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
enum bptype bptype,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct breakpoint *b = XNEW (struct breakpoint);
@@ -5711,7 +5712,7 @@ get_sal_arch (struct symtab_and_line sal)
static void
init_raw_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b, struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal, enum bptype bptype,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
CORE_ADDR adjusted_address;
struct gdbarch *loc_gdbarch;
@@ -5775,7 +5776,7 @@ init_raw_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b, struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct breakpoint *
set_raw_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal, enum bptype bptype,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct breakpoint *b = XNEW (struct breakpoint);
@@ -6616,7 +6617,7 @@ static void
init_catchpoint (struct breakpoint *b,
struct gdbarch *gdbarch, int tempflag,
char *cond_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct symtab_and_line sal;
@@ -6643,7 +6644,7 @@ install_breakpoint (int internal, struct breakpoint *b)
static void
create_fork_vfork_event_catchpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
int tempflag, char *cond_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct fork_catchpoint *c = XNEW (struct fork_catchpoint);
@@ -6762,7 +6763,7 @@ static struct breakpoint_ops catch_exec_breakpoint_ops;
static void
create_syscall_event_catchpoint (int tempflag, VEC(int) *filter,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct syscall_catchpoint *c;
struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_current_arch ();
@@ -6942,7 +6943,7 @@ set_momentary_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct symtab_and_line sal,
static struct breakpoint *
momentary_breakpoint_from_master (struct breakpoint *orig,
enum bptype type,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops)
{
struct breakpoint *copy;
@@ -7093,7 +7094,7 @@ init_breakpoint_sal (struct breakpoint *b, struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
char *cond_string,
enum bptype type, enum bpdisp disposition,
int thread, int task, int ignore_count,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
int enabled, int internal, int display_canonical)
{
int i;
@@ -7218,7 +7219,7 @@ create_breakpoint_sal (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
char *cond_string,
enum bptype type, enum bpdisp disposition,
int thread, int task, int ignore_count,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
int enabled, int internal, int display_canonical)
{
struct breakpoint *b;
@@ -7402,7 +7403,7 @@ create_breakpoints_sal (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
char *cond_string,
enum bptype type, enum bpdisp disposition,
int thread, int task, int ignore_count,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops, int from_tty,
int enabled, int internal)
{
int i;
@@ -7682,7 +7683,7 @@ create_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
int tempflag, enum bptype type_wanted,
int ignore_count,
enum auto_boolean pending_break_support,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
int from_tty, int enabled, int internal)
{
volatile struct gdb_exception e;
@@ -9864,7 +9865,7 @@ init_ada_exception_breakpoint (struct breakpoint *b,
struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal,
char *addr_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
int tempflag,
int from_tty)
{
diff --git a/gdb/breakpoint.h b/gdb/breakpoint.h
index 58e33d4..9b79e3e 100644
--- a/gdb/breakpoint.h
+++ b/gdb/breakpoint.h
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ extern int target_exact_watchpoints;
struct breakpoint
{
/* Methods associated with this breakpoint. */
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops;
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops;
struct breakpoint *next;
/* Type of breakpoint. */
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ extern void
struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
struct symtab_and_line sal,
char *addr_string,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
int tempflag,
int from_tty);
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@ extern int create_breakpoint (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, char *arg,
int tempflag, enum bptype wanted_type,
int ignore_count,
enum auto_boolean pending_break_support,
- struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
+ const struct breakpoint_ops *ops,
int from_tty,
int enabled,
int internal);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-25 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-22 15:42 [0/6] breakpoints_ops for all kinds of breakpoints Pedro Alves
2011-07-22 17:33 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-25 12:39 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-25 16:20 ` Tom Tromey
2011-07-22 17:38 ` Phil Muldoon
2011-07-25 14:17 ` Pedro Alves
2011-07-25 14:40 ` Phil Muldoon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox