From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] mips tracepoint: fix Bug 12013
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 19:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012281723.59829.pedro@codesourcery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101228170851.GA2396@adacore.com>
On Tuesday 28 December 2010 17:08:52, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > Joel, do you think this patch can check in to 7.2.1.
>
> I think that it's borderline, and I'm tempted to say no, considering
> that this is not a crash or a regression (just a limitation). But
> it looks relatively safe to me. So, if Pedro agrees, it's OK with me.
Yeah. I understand that without this patch, MIPS tracepoints are
practically useless on 7.2, so on those grounds, I'd be okay.
However, I just went to check whether collecting a pseudo or
user register in x86/x86_64 still gives a reasonable error, and
I now get:
>./gdb -q ./gdb
Reading symbols from /home/pedro/gdb/baseline/build/gdb/gdb...done.
(top-gdb) start
Temporary breakpoint 3 at 0x4565c3: file ../../src/gdb/gdb.c, line 29.
Starting program: /home/pedro/gdb/baseline/build/gdb/gdb
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Temporary breakpoint 3, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffe108) at ../../src/gdb/gdb.c:29
29 memset (&args, 0, sizeof args);
(top-gdb) maint agent $sp
../../src/gdb/regcache.c:166: internal-error: register_type: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < descr->nr_cooked_registers' failed.
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,
further debugging may prove unreliable.
Quit this debugging session? (y or n)
While before (on 7.2), we'd get:
(top-gdb) maint agent $sp
'sp' is a pseudo-register; GDB cannot yet trace pseudoregister contents.
We'll need to get this fixed this before considering a backport to 7.2.
--
Pedro Alves
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-28 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-19 8:36 Hui Zhu
2010-12-19 10:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-12-19 12:16 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 14:45 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 14:58 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-12-21 15:09 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 15:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-21 15:59 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22 6:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-22 7:12 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22 16:20 ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-23 3:33 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:20 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:56 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-28 4:43 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22 11:27 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-25 19:10 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:52 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-28 9:52 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-28 10:30 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-28 17:09 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-28 18:04 ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-28 19:05 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2010-12-28 19:07 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-29 8:10 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-29 13:06 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-29 16:09 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-29 17:57 ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-30 8:00 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012281723.59829.pedro@codesourcery.com \
--to=pedro@codesourcery.com \
--cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
--cc=teawater@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox