Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: teawater@gmail.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] mips tracepoint: fix Bug 12013
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012211458.oBLEwZHd013682@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin0L2m8fH-4PHB97H89XGo4=yczqd33sFh32dFF@mail.gmail.com>	(message from Hui Zhu on Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:45:15 +0800)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2653 bytes --]

> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:45:15 +0800
> 
> Did not get any reason.

?

> Checked in.

I told you this is wrong.  You'll have to fix this in a different way.
I'm not familliar with the tracepoint stuff, so I can't really help
you with that.

Please back this out immediately.

> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:15, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 18:39, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:35:59 +0800
> >>>
> >>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12013
> >>>
> >>> This bug make mips tracepoint cannot trace the backtrace.
> >>>
> >>> This patch to fix this issue with a directly way just remove the
> >>> decline of access to the raw register names.
> >>>
> >>> If you think it's not OK.  What about add a new interface to gdbarch
> >>> to access to the raw register names.
> >>
> >> It is a common trick to return an empty register name for a (raw)
> >> register to hide the register from the user.  So I don't think this
> >> diff is ok, since the goal obviously is to hide the raw registers in
> >> mips in favour of the pseudo registers.
> >
> > Could you tell me what this hide for?  I didn't find who get some
> > advantage form this part?
> >
> >>
> >> I'd say the proper way forward is to teach the trace code to handle
> >> pseudo registers.
> >
> > void
> > regcache_cooked_read (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum, gdb_byte *buf)
> > {
> >  gdb_assert (regnum >= 0);
> >  gdb_assert (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers);
> >  if (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
> >    regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
> >  else if (regcache->readonly_p
> >           && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers
> >           && regcache->register_valid_p[regnum])
> >    /* Read-only register cache, perhaps the cooked value was cached?  */
> >    memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
> >            regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
> >  else
> >    gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (regcache->descr->gdbarch, regcache,
> >                                  regnum, buf);
> > }
> >
> > For now, even if gdb doesn't how to handle pseudo, it put it to
> > gdbarch.  I need add a new interface to gdbarch to handle it if we
> > really need.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hui
> >
> >>
> >>> 2010-12-19  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>       * mips-tdep.c (mips_register_name): Remove the check.
> >>>       (mips_print_registers_info): Remove the gdb_assert.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-21 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-19  8:36 Hui Zhu
2010-12-19 10:39 ` Mark Kettenis
2010-12-19 12:16   ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 14:45     ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 14:58       ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2010-12-21 15:09         ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-21 15:42     ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-21 15:59       ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22  6:04         ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-22  7:12           ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22 16:20             ` Kevin Buettner
2010-12-23  3:33               ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:20                 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:56                   ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-28  4:43                     ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-22 11:27           ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-25 19:10             ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-27 13:52               ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-28  9:52                 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-28 10:30                   ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-28 17:09                     ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-28 18:04                       ` Joel Brobecker
2010-12-28 19:05                         ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-28 19:07                           ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-29  8:10                             ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-29 13:06                               ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-29 16:09                                 ` Hui Zhu
2010-12-29 17:57                                   ` Pedro Alves
2010-12-30  8:00                                     ` Hui Zhu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201012211458.oBLEwZHd013682@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl \
    --to=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=teawater@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox