> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:45:15 +0800
> 
> Did not get any reason.

?

> Checked in.

I told you this is wrong.  You'll have to fix this in a different way.
I'm not familliar with the tracepoint stuff, so I can't really help
you with that.

Please back this out immediately.

> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 20:15, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 18:39, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> >>> From: Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:35:59 +0800
> >>>
> >>> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12013
> >>>
> >>> This bug make mips tracepoint cannot trace the backtrace.
> >>>
> >>> This patch to fix this issue with a directly way just remove the
> >>> decline of access to the raw register names.
> >>>
> >>> If you think it's not OK.  What about add a new interface to gdbarch
> >>> to access to the raw register names.
> >>
> >> It is a common trick to return an empty register name for a (raw)
> >> register to hide the register from the user.  So I don't think this
> >> diff is ok, since the goal obviously is to hide the raw registers in
> >> mips in favour of the pseudo registers.
> >
> > Could you tell me what this hide for?  I didn't find who get some
> > advantage form this part?
> >
> >>
> >> I'd say the proper way forward is to teach the trace code to handle
> >> pseudo registers.
> >
> > void
> > regcache_cooked_read (struct regcache *regcache, int regnum, gdb_byte *buf)
> > {
> >  gdb_assert (regnum >= 0);
> >  gdb_assert (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers);
> >  if (regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers)
> >    regcache_raw_read (regcache, regnum, buf);
> >  else if (regcache->readonly_p
> >           && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_cooked_registers
> >           && regcache->register_valid_p[regnum])
> >    /* Read-only register cache, perhaps the cooked value was cached?  */
> >    memcpy (buf, register_buffer (regcache, regnum),
> >            regcache->descr->sizeof_register[regnum]);
> >  else
> >    gdbarch_pseudo_register_read (regcache->descr->gdbarch, regcache,
> >                                  regnum, buf);
> > }
> >
> > For now, even if gdb doesn't how to handle pseudo, it put it to
> > gdbarch.  I need add a new interface to gdbarch to handle it if we
> > really need.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hui
> >
> >>
> >>> 2010-12-19  Hui Zhu  <teawater@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>       * mips-tdep.c (mips_register_name): Remove the check.
> >>>       (mips_print_registers_info): Remove the gdb_assert.
> >>>
> >>
> >
> 
>