From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, bje@au1.ibm.com,
anton@au1.ibm.com, pgilliam@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060202014308.GA19507@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601251555470.3568@wks190239wss.cn.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601251114330.3568@wks190239wss.cn.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:34:14PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> I am also thinking of replace the macro
> TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT (SIZE) with
> TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT(ADDR, SIZE). Thus the code will seem
> to be more clean: we will only have one macro to see if the target region
> is ok for watchpoint monitoring. Following this way, function
> default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint will also return back to its original
> implementation. What is your thought on this?
I'm not sure what you mean. After these patches, the only reference to
TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT is in gdbint.texinfo (which I'd
appreciate if you fixed, in a separate patch - thanks in advance).
What are the two ways now?
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:18:49AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> OK to commit?
>
> 2006-01-22 Ben Elliston <bje@au1.ibm.com>
> Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
>
> * ppc-linux-nat.c (PTRACE_GET_DEBUGREG, PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG,
> PTRACE_GETSIGINFO): Define.
> (last_stopped_data_address): New.
> (ppc_linux_check_watch_resources): New function.
> (ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> (ppc_linux_insert_watchpoint): New function.
> (ppc_linux_remove_watchpoint): New function.
> (ppc_linux_stopped_data_address): New function.
> (ppc_linux_stopped_by_watchpoint): New function.
> (_initialize_ppc_linux_nat): Set the above hardware watchpoint
> related target vectors.
> * rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Set PPC architectures
> to have nonsteppable watchpoint.
> * target.c (default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint,
> debug_to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New prototypes.
> (update_current_target): Inherit to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> and set default to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> (default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> (debug_to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> (setup_target_debug): Set to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint of
> debug_target.
> * target.h (struct target_ops): Add a new target vector
> to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Define this if it is not
> defined anyplace else.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:34:14PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> 2006-01-25 Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
>
> * breakpoint.c (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> * config/i386/nm-i386sol2.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> (TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> * config/mips/nm-irix5.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> (TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> * config/sparc/nm-sol2.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> (TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> * inf-ttrace.c (inf_ttrace_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New.
> (inf_ttrace_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> (inf_ttrace_target): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint and
> add to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> * s390-nat.c (s390_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> (s390_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New.
> (_initialize_s390_nat): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> and add to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> * target.c (default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint,
> debug_to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete prototype.
> (update_current_target): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> inheritance and default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> (default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): If len is less than or equal
> the length of void pointer, return ok.
> (default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> (debug_to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> (setup_target_debug): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> * target.h (struct target_ops): Delete
> to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> (TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
These patches are both OK. You might want to combine them - it's a
much smaller diff :-) But it doesn't matter since you've already got
them separated out.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-02 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-22 15:26 Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:38 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-23 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-22 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 3:40 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 4:33 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 11:00 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 21:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 3:19 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-25 8:34 ` Replace to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint references with to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint ones Wu Zhou
2006-02-02 1:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-08 5:35 ` [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 5:44 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13 9:53 ` Wu Zhou
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-06 19:54 Wu Zhou
2005-12-06 22:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-09 12:00 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-06 23:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 12:04 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-10 22:23 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-11 11:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-11 14:39 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-13 22:47 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-14 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-14 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-15 20:06 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-16 0:10 ` Anton Blanchard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060202014308.GA19507@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bje@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
--cc=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox