Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, 	bje@au1.ibm.com,
	anton@au1.ibm.com, pgilliam@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 01:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060202014308.GA19507@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601251555470.3568@wks190239wss.cn.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601251114330.3568@wks190239wss.cn.ibm.com>

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:34:14PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> I am also thinking of replace the macro 
> TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT (SIZE) with 
> TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT(ADDR, SIZE).  Thus the code will seem 
> to be more clean: we will only have one macro to see if the target region 
> is ok for watchpoint monitoring.  Following this way, function 
> default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint will also return back to its original 
> implementation.  What is your thought on this?

I'm not sure what you mean.  After these patches, the only reference to
TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT is in gdbint.texinfo (which I'd
appreciate if you fixed, in a separate patch - thanks in advance).
What are the two ways now?

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:18:49AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> OK to commit?
> 
> 2006-01-22  Ben Elliston  <bje@au1.ibm.com>
> 	    Wu Zhou  <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> 
> 	* ppc-linux-nat.c (PTRACE_GET_DEBUGREG, PTRACE_SET_DEBUGREG,
> 	PTRACE_GETSIGINFO): Define.
> 	(last_stopped_data_address): New.
> 	(ppc_linux_check_watch_resources): New function.
> 	(ppc_linux_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(ppc_linux_insert_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(ppc_linux_remove_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(ppc_linux_stopped_data_address): New function.
> 	(ppc_linux_stopped_by_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(_initialize_ppc_linux_nat): Set the above hardware watchpoint
> 	related target vectors.
> 	* rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_gdbarch_init): Set PPC architectures
> 	to have nonsteppable watchpoint.
> 	* target.c (default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint,
> 	debug_to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New prototypes.
> 	(update_current_target): Inherit to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> 	and set default to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	(default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(debug_to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New function.
> 	(setup_target_debug): Set to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint of 
> 	debug_target.
> 	* target.h (struct target_ops): Add a new target vector 
> 	to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	(TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Define this if it is not
> 	defined anyplace else.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:34:14PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> 2006-01-25  Wu Zhou  <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
> 
> 	* breakpoint.c (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> 	* config/i386/nm-i386sol2.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> 	(TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> 	* config/mips/nm-irix5.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> 	(TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> 	* config/sparc/nm-sol2.h (TARGET_REGION_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): New.
> 	(TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.
> 	* inf-ttrace.c (inf_ttrace_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New.
> 	(inf_ttrace_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> 	(inf_ttrace_target): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint and
> 	add to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	* s390-nat.c (s390_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> 	(s390_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): New.
> 	(_initialize_s390_nat): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> 	and add to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	* target.c (default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint, 
> 	debug_to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete prototype.
> 	(update_current_target): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> 	inheritance and default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	(default_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): If len is less than or equal
> 	the length of void pointer, return ok.
> 	(default_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> 	(debug_to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint): Delete.
> 	(setup_target_debug): Delete to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	* target.h (struct target_ops): Delete 
> 	to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint.
> 	(TARGET_REGION_SIZE_OK_FOR_HW_WATCHPOINT): Delete.

These patches are both OK.  You might want to combine them - it's a
much smaller diff :-)  But it doesn't matter since you've already got
them separated out.


-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2006-02-02  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-22 15:26 Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:38 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:57   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-22 15:57     ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-23 20:52       ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-22 20:56       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24  3:40         ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24  3:43           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24  4:33             ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 11:00               ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 21:20                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25  3:19                   ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-25  8:34                   ` Replace to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint references with to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint ones Wu Zhou
2006-02-02  1:43                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2006-02-08  5:35                       ` [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Wu Zhou
2006-02-09  5:44                         ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09  7:44                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13  9:53                             ` Wu Zhou
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-12-06 19:54 Wu Zhou
2005-12-06 22:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-09 12:00   ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:34     ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-06 23:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 23:31   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 12:04     ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:22       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 18:58         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-10 22:23         ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-11 11:12           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-11 14:39             ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-13 22:47             ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-14 18:12               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-14 18:13               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-15 20:06                 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-16  0:10                   ` Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060202014308.GA19507@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=bje@au1.ibm.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=pgilliam@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox