From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, drow@false.org, eliz@gnu.org,
mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:00:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512091009170.18692@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200512061823.jB6INQFp007018@53v30g16.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> You should be setting the target vector's to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint
> function instead. See s390-nat.c where I now implement full watchpoint
> support without any nm.h macro defined ...
>
Thanks a lot. That is a very good sample. But I see that you didn't
implement to_stopped_data_address either. Do you think it is mandatory? It
seems that it is mainly used in rwatch and awatch.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-09 2:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 19:54 Wu Zhou
2005-12-06 22:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-09 12:00 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-12-09 14:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-06 23:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 12:04 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-10 22:23 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-11 11:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-11 14:39 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-13 22:47 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-14 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-14 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-15 20:06 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-16 0:10 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-12-22 15:26 Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:38 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-23 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-22 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 3:40 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 4:33 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 11:00 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 21:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 3:19 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-25 8:34 ` Replace to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint references with to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint ones Wu Zhou
2006-02-02 1:43 ` [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-08 5:35 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 5:44 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13 9:53 ` Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0512091009170.18692@linux.site \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox