From: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:47:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512131318090.30718@linux.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051210044752.GA30979@nevyn.them.org>
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 12:46:36PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:25:33AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > > >
> > > > BTW. It seems that to_stopped_data_address is only used in rwatch and
> > > > awatch, which is not that frequently used as watch itself. So may we
> > > > postpone its implementation till some later time?
> > >
> > > No, let's get it right the first time. rwatch is extremely valuable,
> > > and it sounds like you're having to play with ABI changes to get it to
> > > work.
> >
> > OK. I will try to make it right the first time. :-)
> >
> > And can you elaborate on the statement that I am having to play with ABI
> > changes to get it to work? It seems that you must find something
> > noticeable, right? If so, please point out. Thanks.
>
> I was just talking about Anton's kernel patch. If you're still
> changing the kernel to make it work, it's not quite done yet.
I am now trying three different method to get the stopped data address.
But aach one seems to have its shortcoming , so I had to list them here to
solicit comments and suggestions. Thanks in advance.
1. The first one don't need any more change to kernel 2.6.14.3, I use
GET_DEBUG_REG to get the content of DABR and assume it is the same as the
stopped_data_address. But the problem is that the content of DABR is not
all the time the same as the data breakpoint. What DABR monitor is an
8-bytes region. The last three bits are used for setting read/write/translating
flag.
The code is something like this:
tid = TIDGET (ptid);
if (tid == 0)
tid = PIDGET (ptid);
ptrace (PTRACE_GET_DEBUGREG, tid, (PTRACE_TYPE_ARG3) 0, addr_p);
*addr_p = *addr_p & ~7;
2. The second one need Anton's patch, which changed three lines in
arch/ppc64/mm/fault.c:
Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c 2005-11-16
03:21:49.000000000 +1100
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/fault.c 2005-12-08
16:34:21.000000000 +1100
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@
}
#if !(defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE))
-static void do_dabr(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
+static void do_dabr(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address,
+ unsigned long error_code)
{
siginfo_t info;
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@
info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
info.si_errno = 0;
info.si_code = TRAP_HWBKPT;
- info.si_addr = (void __user *)regs->nip;
+ info.si_addr = (void __user *)address;
force_sig_info(SIGTRAP, &info, current);
}
#endif /* !(CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE)*/
@@ -159,7 +160,7 @@
#if !(defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE))
if (error_code & DSISR_DABRMATCH) {
/* DABR match */
- do_dabr(regs, error_code);
+ do_dabr(regs, address, error_code);
return 0;
}
#endif /* !(CONFIG_4xx || CONFIG_BOOKE)*/
With this patch, I can use PTRACE_GETSIGINFO to get the stopped data
address (it is in siginfo.si_addr). But one problem is that
to_stopped_by_watchpoint will call PTRACE_GETSIGINFO first to determine if
the stop is caused by watchpoint. And another problem is that gdb need to
single step the process to execute current instruction when a watchpoint
is hit. This will again drop into bpstat_stop_status, which will call
stopped_by_watchpoint and thus call PTRACE_GETSIGINFO again.
I take a look at IA64's code, it set the dd bit of IA64_PSR_REGNUM, which
will disable the watchpoint for the next instruction. But it seems that
ppc don't have such a way. Do we have any workaround for this?
3. The third one is a little tricky. Now that ppc has at most 1 DABR. So
I can set the stopped_data_address to the data address when we set the
watchpoint (in ppc_linux_insert_watchpoint). Everytime
target_stopped_data_address is called, the breakpoint is either read or
access, so it is already clear that it is stopped by watchpoint. Then
this trick seems to make sense, right?
I had tested the above three methods. The first one works ok when the
data breakpoint is aligned by 8 bytes. The third one works ok for both
aligned and non-aligned data breakpoint. For the second one, I don't know
how to work around the extra PTRACE_GETSIGINFO call caused by the single
step yet. But if I reserver the stopped_data_address when we first
hit watchpoint, and store it back when I call ppc_linux_stopped_data_address.
I can make rwatch and awatch to work as expected.
Any comments on the above three methods. Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards
- Wu Zhou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 19:54 Wu Zhou
2005-12-06 22:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-09 12:00 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-06 23:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 12:04 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-10 22:23 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-11 11:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-11 14:39 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-13 22:47 ` Wu Zhou [this message]
2005-12-14 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-14 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-15 20:06 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-16 0:10 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-12-22 15:26 Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:38 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-23 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-22 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 3:40 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 4:33 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 11:00 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 21:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 3:19 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-25 8:34 ` Replace to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint references with to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint ones Wu Zhou
2006-02-02 1:43 ` [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-08 5:35 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 5:44 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13 9:53 ` Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0512131318090.30718@linux.site \
--to=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bje@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox