From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Wu Zhou <woodzltc@cn.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
bje@au1.ibm.com, anton@au1.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051213203546.GA11674@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0512131318090.30718@linux.site>
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 02:10:03PM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> 2. The second one need Anton's patch, which changed three lines in
> arch/ppc64/mm/fault.c:
> With this patch, I can use PTRACE_GETSIGINFO to get the stopped data
> address (it is in siginfo.si_addr). But one problem is that
> to_stopped_by_watchpoint will call PTRACE_GETSIGINFO first to determine if
> the stop is caused by watchpoint. And another problem is that gdb need to
> single step the process to execute current instruction when a watchpoint
> is hit. This will again drop into bpstat_stop_status, which will call
> stopped_by_watchpoint and thus call PTRACE_GETSIGINFO again.
>
> I take a look at IA64's code, it set the dd bit of IA64_PSR_REGNUM, which
> will disable the watchpoint for the next instruction. But it seems that
> ppc don't have such a way. Do we have any workaround for this?
Could you cache the stopped data address when we are stopped by a
watchpoint, and then return the cached one if we aren't stopped by a
watchpoint any more but were the previous instruction?
I realize this is gross; the entire "step, then check the stopped data
address" is a bad idea, in my opinion.
> 3. The third one is a little tricky. Now that ppc has at most 1 DABR. So
> I can set the stopped_data_address to the data address when we set the
> watchpoint (in ppc_linux_insert_watchpoint). Everytime
> target_stopped_data_address is called, the breakpoint is either read or
> access, so it is already clear that it is stopped by watchpoint. Then
> this trick seems to make sense, right?
Weren't there other PPCs with more than one though?
> I had tested the above three methods. The first one works ok when the
> data breakpoint is aligned by 8 bytes. The third one works ok for both
> aligned and non-aligned data breakpoint. For the second one, I don't know
> how to work around the extra PTRACE_GETSIGINFO call caused by the single
> step yet. But if I reserver the stopped_data_address when we first
> hit watchpoint, and store it back when I call ppc_linux_stopped_data_address.
> I can make rwatch and awatch to work as expected.
... right, I guess I should have read your whole message first! That's
my preferred option if we can find a clean way to do it. I thought
there was a target with an example of this, but I can't find it. I'm
not sure I understand why ia64 needs to disable the watchpoint, though.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-13 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-12-06 19:54 Wu Zhou
2005-12-06 22:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-09 12:00 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:34 ` Ulrich Weigand
2005-12-06 23:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-06 23:31 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 12:04 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-09 14:22 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-09 18:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-10 22:23 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-11 11:12 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-12-11 14:39 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-13 22:47 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-14 18:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-14 18:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-12-15 20:06 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-16 0:10 ` Anton Blanchard
2005-12-22 15:26 Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:38 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-12-22 15:57 ` Wu Zhou
2005-12-23 20:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-22 20:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 3:40 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 3:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 4:33 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 11:00 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-24 21:20 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-25 3:19 ` Wu Zhou
2006-01-25 8:34 ` Replace to_region_size_ok_for_hw_watchpoint references with to_region_ok_for_hw_watchpoint ones Wu Zhou
2006-02-02 1:43 ` [RFC] GDB patches for hw watchpoints - revised Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-02-08 5:35 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 5:44 ` Wu Zhou
2006-02-09 7:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-02-13 9:53 ` Wu Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051213203546.GA11674@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@false.org \
--cc=anton@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=bje@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=woodzltc@cn.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox