From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: PATCH: tests for MI commands
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:31:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <17126.51233.887175.402254@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050724211946.GB798@nevyn.them.org>
> Thanks. The tests themselves look roughly fine, but:
>
> > * gdb.mi/mi-var-child.exp: Adapt tests for extra elements and use
> > them for tests for "-var-update --no-values" and
> > "-var-update --all-values".
> > Add test for "-var-list-children --simple-values.
>
> Missing quote mark.
OK.
>
> > *************** do_children_tests (void)
> > *** 227,232 ****
> > --- 227,234 ----
> > struct_declarations.long_array[9] = 1234;
> >
> > weird->func_ptr = nothing;
> > + struct_declarations.long_array[10] = 3456;
> > + struct_declarations.long_array[11] = 5678;
> >
> > /* Struct/pointer/array tests */
> > a0 = '0';
> >
>
> You had a bunch of changes that only were needed because you added
> initializations between weird->func_ptr = nothing and a0 = '0'; why not
> put them above it, with the others? There might be some problem with
> that I haven't seen...
The test c_variable-5.8 uses "-var-update *" so I have to change the values of
the added array elements after this test to get a fresh changelist. The
testfile currently stops at "weird->func_ptr = nothing" so it seemed
convenient to add these tests after it. I'm not sure that it would be
simpler, but I can put them above if you prefer.
> > ! # Step over "weird->func_ptr = nothing;"
> > ! set line_dct_a0_0 [gdb_get_line_number "a0 = '0';"]
> > mi_step_to do_children_tests {} {.*var-cmd.c} \
> > ! $line_dct_a0_0 "step \$line_dct_a0_0"
>
> > --- 833,842 ----
>
> > ! # Step over weird->func_ptr = nothing;
> > mi_step_to do_children_tests {} {.*var-cmd.c} \
> > ! [expr $line_dct_nothing + 1] "step \$line_dct_nothing + 1"
>
> Please don't do math on line numbers; gdb_get_line_number helps make
> test cases more robust against changes in the test source.
I was trying to copy existing practice. The testfile seems to use
gdb_get_line_number to get to test blocks and step from there e.g:
# Step over "struct_declarations.integer = 123;"
mi_step_to do_children_tests {} {.*var-cmd.c} \
[expr $line_dct_123 + 1] "step \$line_dct_123 + 1"
The lines:
set line_dct_a0_0 [gdb_get_line_number "a0 = '0';"]
mi_step_to do_children_tests {} {.*var-cmd.c} \
$line_dct_a0_0 "step \$line_dct_a0_0"
are still present but occur later in the file by the comment:
# Step over struct_declarations.long_array[11] = 5678;
Is this acceptable or do you want me to use gdb_get_line_number for each
test?
> > + # Step overstruct_declarations.long_array[10] = 3456;
>
> > + "update all vars struct_declarations.long_array.10 changed, don't print values."
>
> Missing space; extra space.
OK
Nick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-26 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-20 4:51 Nick Roberts
2005-07-24 21:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-26 23:31 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2005-07-27 0:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-27 3:04 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-27 3:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-27 11:46 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-27 12:50 ` Bob Rossi
2005-07-27 20:52 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-27 21:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-27 22:09 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-27 21:03 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-27 22:23 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-28 0:08 ` Paul Gilliam
2005-07-28 0:18 ` Stan Shebs
2005-07-28 0:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-28 1:39 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 22:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 23:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-01 1:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-27 21:25 ` Mark Kettenis
2005-07-29 7:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-07-31 21:25 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-07-31 23:32 ` Nick Roberts
2005-08-01 1:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=17126.51233.887175.402254@farnswood.snap.net.nz \
--to=nickrob@snap.net.nz \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox