From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, "Jakob Engblom" <jakob@virtutech.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
Subject: Re: gdb reverse execution: how to actually run tests for it?
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fxbnbx36.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200908191328.57310.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:28:57 +0100")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com> writes:
Pedro> For the generic reverse execution tests --- reverse step, reverse
Pedro> next, reverse continue, run to breakpoint in reverse, etc., etc.,
Pedro> I'd must prefer that we would get rid of the need for board files
Pedro> at all. :-)
Pedro> 1. for native targets, the only reverse solution we currently support is
Pedro> precord. I can't see why we can't default to testing the reverse tests
Pedro> with precord then.
I agree.
If the tests aren't enabled by default on some common platforms and thus
run as a regular part of testing, you can be sure there will be
regressions here.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-19 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 7:42 Jakob Engblom
2009-08-17 7:58 ` Hui Zhu
2009-08-17 11:33 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-17 11:50 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-17 11:55 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 15:31 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-17 15:52 ` Hui Zhu
2009-08-20 17:10 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-19 7:34 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-17 18:24 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-17 20:08 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-17 22:44 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-19 7:24 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-19 8:58 ` Simics & reverse execution Jakob Engblom
2009-08-19 12:29 ` Hui Zhu
2009-08-19 20:03 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-19 20:29 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-19 20:44 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-19 21:09 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-20 6:54 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-20 15:03 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-27 4:44 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-27 8:17 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-28 11:04 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-28 15:17 ` Greg Law
2009-08-31 13:22 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-31 16:34 ` Greg Law
2009-09-01 6:37 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-01 13:49 ` Greg Law
2009-09-03 19:16 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-04 12:44 ` Greg Law
2009-09-07 7:16 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-07 8:13 ` Greg Law
2009-09-07 8:24 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-07 12:06 ` Greg Law
2009-09-08 7:21 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-08 12:08 ` Greg Law
2009-09-08 13:02 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-08 19:11 ` Greg Law
2009-09-14 8:26 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-09-17 3:07 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-19 7:24 ` gdb reverse execution: how to actually run tests for it? Jakob Engblom
2009-08-19 15:28 ` Pedro Alves
2009-08-19 16:37 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-08-20 13:10 ` Jakob Engblom
2009-08-20 14:50 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-08-20 20:27 ` Michael Snyder
2009-08-20 6:53 ` Hui Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3fxbnbx36.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
--cc=jakob@virtutech.com \
--cc=msnyder@vmware.com \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox