* Re: mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter
[not found] <20081107201949.23460.qmail@sourceware.org>
@ 2008-11-10 8:22 ` Nick Roberts
2008-11-11 0:53 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2008-11-10 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pawel.piech; +Cc: gdb
> I have the following trace from a debug session:
>
> 226,777 52-data-list-register-values --thread 1 d 3
> 226,778 53-data-list-register-values --thread 1 t 3
> 226,778 54-data-list-register-values --thread 1 N 3
> 226,779 55-data-list-register-values --thread 1 o 3 0 1 2 4 5 6
> 226,781 52^done,register-values=[{number="3",value="-1209315340"}]
> 226,781 (gdb)
> 226,782 53^done,register-values=[{number="3",value="-1209315340"}]
> 226,782 (gdb)
> 226,782 54^done,register-values=[{number="3",value="-1209315340"}]
> 226,782 (gdb)
> 226,783 55^done,register-values=[{number="3",value="-1209315340"},{number="0",value="-1073743420"},{number="1",value="-1073743552"},{number="2",value="1"},{number="4",value="0xbffff920"},{number="5",value="0xbffff928"},{number="6",value="-1207956256"}]
> 226,783 (gdb)
FWIW I can see this regression too. I think it's due to this change:
2008-10-28 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
...
(val_print): Remove format, deref_ref, pretty arguments; add
options. Update.
...
The test mi2-regs.exp only tests this command on Solaris, so running the
testsuite on any other architecture wouldn't reveal the problem.
I've cc'ed the GDB mailing list rather than GNATS as it's a recent change and
this list seems to get more attention.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter
2008-11-10 8:22 ` mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter Nick Roberts
@ 2008-11-11 0:53 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-11 2:11 ` Tom Tromey
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2008-11-11 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Roberts; +Cc: pawel.piech, gdb
>>>>> "Nick" == Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz> writes:
Nick> FWIW I can see this regression too. I think it's due to this change:
[...]
Please try this patch.
I am sending it through regression testing.
Tom
2008-11-10 Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
* mi/mi-main.c (get_register): Use get_formatted_print_options.
diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
index a9fbcad..4554008 100644
--- a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
+++ b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ get_register (int regnum, int format)
else
{
struct value_print_options opts;
- get_user_print_options (&opts);
+ get_formatted_print_options (&opts, format);
opts.deref_ref = 1;
val_print (register_type (current_gdbarch, regnum), buffer, 0, 0,
stb->stream, 0, &opts, current_language);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter
2008-11-11 0:53 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2008-11-11 2:11 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-11 8:51 ` Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2008-11-11 2:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nick Roberts; +Cc: pawel.piech, gdb
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
Tom> I am sending it through regression testing.
FYI, it passed there. Not super surprising, but still good to know.
Tom
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter
2008-11-11 2:11 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2008-11-11 8:51 ` Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 2008-11-11 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tromey; +Cc: pawel.piech, gdb
Tom Tromey writes:
> >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:
>
> Tom> I am sending it through regression testing.
>
> FYI, it passed there. Not super surprising, but still good to know.
I agree. It's not that surprising as your change is in get_registers which
only gets called by mi_cmd_data_list_register_values and, as I said earlier,
there are currently no tests for -data-list-register-values except on sparc.
Why not add the tests below? There were three failures before your change and
they all pass after it. They're pretty basic, and I don't know if there are
any architectures for which they wouldn't work, but they would at least prevent
this regression from occurring again.
--
Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob
# Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test essential Machine interface (MI) operations
#
# Verify that, using the MI, we can run a simple program and look at registers.
#
# The goal is not to test gdb functionality, which is done by other tests,
# but to verify the correct output response to MI operations.
#
load_lib mi-support.exp
set MIFLAGS "-i=mi"
gdb_exit
if [mi_gdb_start] {
continue
}
set testfile "basics"
set srcfile ${testfile}.c
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}
if { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug additional_flags=-DFAKEARGV}] != "" } {
untested mi-regs.exp
return -1
}
proc register_tests_no_exec { } {
# Test the generic IDT chip.
mi_gdb_test "111-data-list-register-values" \
".*111\\^error,msg=\"mi_cmd_data_list_register_values: Usage: -data-list-register-values <format> \\\[<regnum1>...<regnumN>\\\]\"" \
"wrong arguments"
mi_gdb_test "111-data-list-register-values x" \
".*111\\^error,msg=\"No registers\.\"" \
"no executable"
}
proc register_tests { } {
global hex
global decimal
set octal "\[0-7\]+"
set binary "\[0-1\]+"
set float "\\-?((\[0-9\]+(\\.\[0-9\]+)?(e\[-+\]\[0-9\]+)?)|(nan\\($hex\\)))"
mi_gdb_test "222-data-list-register-values x" \
"222\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$hex\"\}.*\\\]" \
"register values x"
mi_gdb_test "333-data-list-register-values f" \
"333\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$float\"\}.*\\\]" \
"register values f"
mi_gdb_test "444-data-list-register-values d" \
"444\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"-?$decimal\"\}.*\\\]" \
"register values d"
mi_gdb_test "555-data-list-register-values o" \
"555\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$octal\"\}.*\\\]" \
"register values o"
mi_gdb_test "666-data-list-register-values t" \
"666\\^done,register-values=\\\[\{number=\"0\",value=\"$binary\"\}.*\\\]" \
"register values t"
}
register_tests_no_exec
mi_run_to_main
register_tests
mi_gdb_exit
return 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-11 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20081107201949.23460.qmail@sourceware.org>
2008-11-10 8:22 ` mi/2549: data-list-register-values igonores the format parameter Nick Roberts
2008-11-11 0:53 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-11 2:11 ` Tom Tromey
2008-11-11 8:51 ` Nick Roberts
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox