Rvalue references support?

Rvalue references support?

[Juraj Oršulić]

Hello, I was wondering if rvalue references could be debugged from
gdb. A series for patches was sent for review in March 2016. Is this
eventually going to be accepted?

https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00433.html

Regards,
Juraj Oršulić

Re: Rvalue references support?

[Pedro Alves]

On 03/09/2017 12:16 PM, Juraj Oršulić wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering if rvalue references could be debugged from
> gdb. A series for patches was sent for review in March 2016. Is this
> eventually going to be accepted?
> 
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-03/msg00433.html

Yeah...  This is mostly been approved with some nits, but it has
lingered on with no one doing the final work.  Keith revived
that patch recently, and found some further issues with overload
resolution, IIUC.  I think it's going to be too late for 8.0 to address
those, but given that rvalue refs just don't work at all currently,
I think that we should at least make sure that that series is
included in the incoming GDB 8.0 as is.  We can always address
the discovered problems afterwards.  But maybe Keith has already
sorted everything out...  Stay tuned.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Re: Rvalue references support?

[Keith Seitz]

On 03/09/2017 04:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> I think that we should at least make sure that that series is
> included in the incoming GDB 8.0 as is.  We can always address
> the discovered problems afterwards.  But maybe Keith has already
> sorted everything out...  Stay tuned.

Nope, not sorted yet. I've discovered a few further problems with
overload resolution. Nonetheless, my plan is to finish addressing the
last comments on the series (largely I've rewritten several tests), and
submit the series, overload problems and all, marking failing tests KFAIL.

If I can get the overload resolution sorted before 8.0 is released, all
the better, but like Pedro, something is better than nothing.

Keith

Re: Rvalue references support?

[Juraj Oršulić]

Thanks on the response! Good to know that there is a possiblity that
it will get int 8.0. :)

Greetings,
Juraj

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 03/09/2017 04:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> I think that we should at least make sure that that series is
>> included in the incoming GDB 8.0 as is.  We can always address
>> the discovered problems afterwards.  But maybe Keith has already
>> sorted everything out...  Stay tuned.
>
> Nope, not sorted yet. I've discovered a few further problems with
> overload resolution. Nonetheless, my plan is to finish addressing the
> last comments on the series (largely I've rewritten several tests), and
> submit the series, overload problems and all, marking failing tests KFAIL.
>
> If I can get the overload resolution sorted before 8.0 is released, all
> the better, but like Pedro, something is better than nothing.
>
> Keith