From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129089 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2017 22:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 128853 invoked by uid 89); 9 Mar 2017 22:14:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=largely, H*MI:sk:5f0b16e, H*f:sk:5f0b16e, H*i:sk:5f0b16e X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:14:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813FBBAF0; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from valrhona.uglyboxes.com (ovpn04.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.4]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v29MEUh7005089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 17:14:31 -0500 Subject: Re: Rvalue references support? To: Pedro Alves , =?UTF-8?B?SnVyYWogT3LFoXVsacSH?= , gdb@sourceware.org References: <5f0b16e4-8d9d-0312-5d93-d1cb87662d98@redhat.com> From: Keith Seitz Message-ID: <58C1D3C5.4030003@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 22:14:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5f0b16e4-8d9d-0312-5d93-d1cb87662d98@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-03/txt/msg00013.txt.bz2 On 03/09/2017 04:47 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: > I think that we should at least make sure that that series is > included in the incoming GDB 8.0 as is. We can always address > the discovered problems afterwards. But maybe Keith has already > sorted everything out... Stay tuned. Nope, not sorted yet. I've discovered a few further problems with overload resolution. Nonetheless, my plan is to finish addressing the last comments on the series (largely I've rewritten several tests), and submit the series, overload problems and all, marking failing tests KFAIL. If I can get the overload resolution sorted before 8.0 is released, all the better, but like Pedro, something is better than nothing. Keith